2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive screw fixation is as stable as anterior plating in acetabular T-Type fractures – a biomechanical study

Abstract: III, case control prospective experimental study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the Smith-Petersen approach, the femoral head can be exposed directly with Figure 4 position (abduction and external rotation) of the affected hip, without dislocation of the femoral head. Anterior plating fixation in transverse or T-type fracture was performed based on Becker's biomechanical study [ 29 ]. They compared minimally invasive screw fixation and anterior plating in the treatment of acetabular T-type fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the Smith-Petersen approach, the femoral head can be exposed directly with Figure 4 position (abduction and external rotation) of the affected hip, without dislocation of the femoral head. Anterior plating fixation in transverse or T-type fracture was performed based on Becker's biomechanical study [ 29 ]. They compared minimally invasive screw fixation and anterior plating in the treatment of acetabular T-type fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous research [ 20 , 21 ], the parameters displacement (mm) and stiffness (N/mm) were used to compare the biomechanical properties of the different fixation techniques.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequently investigated fracture types in biomechanical tests as well as in FEA were an ACPHT fracture (biomechanical tests: 11; FEA: 3) [ 36 44 , 60 , 63 , 66 , 71 ], a posterior column/wall fracture (biomechanical tests: 9; FEA: 2) [ 52 59 , 62 , 67 ], and a transverse acetabular fracture (biomechanical tests: 7; FEA: 2) [ 28 34 , 70 ]. Other fracture types (associated both column fracture, T-shape fracture and isolated anterior column fracture) were less frequently studied in biomechanical analyses [ 35 , 45 51 , 61 , 64 , 65 , 68 70 ]. The numbers of investigated fracture types within the reported studies are demonstrated in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For biomechanical tests, research groups could choose between human cadaveric pelves prepared in various ways, or synthetic pelvis models, which consisted of bone substitutes intended to reflect the biomechanics of physiological bone. Most research groups investigating fixation methods for acetabular fractures used synthetic pelves models (25 test setups) [ 28 32 , 35 44 , 49 51 , 54 56 , 60 63 ]. These models consisted of a whole pelvis or a hemipelvis model fixed in different ways to enable particular loading directions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation