2023
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01506-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive surgery and liver transplantation: is it a safe, feasible, and effective approach?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, our patients’ recovery times were longer than those described for minimally invasive surgery. 28 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, our patients’ recovery times were longer than those described for minimally invasive surgery. 28 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, our patients' recovery times were longer than those described for minimally invasive surgery. 28 Our technique could be used in the context of complex incisional hernias derived from renal transplants, where complication and recurrence rates are higher because of risk factors such as an increased need of immunosuppression, more complex incisions, and a higher rate of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases in this patient population. 29,30 We did not encounter hyperacute, acute, or chronic rejection in our study, and there was no need to adjust the immunosuppression regimens, even in patients receiving monotherapy with mycophenolate, which is a minimally tolerable immunosuppressant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the efficacy and safety of MIS, even on patients with the above contraindications, has been scientifically proven [5]. The above findings have led to the application of MIS in liver transplant recipients as well as living liver donors, with potentially better outcomes than the traditional open techniques [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, application of MIS techniques has been a matter of debate due to the fear of graft loss. During recent years, MIS application reports in LT recipients have increased, with the majority of them relating to the treatment of postoperative applications [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%