2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomic surgery as a primary treatment for patients with stage IA1-IIA2 cervical cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the surgical operation of the nanodrug delivery system still belongs to laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, in addition to inheriting the advantages of minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery, it has some unique advantages [ 18 ]. The terminal organs of the nanodrug surgery system have multiple functions, allowing the operator performs complex surgical operations in a small space.…”
Section: Methods Of Research On the Impact Of Urinary Tract Injury Du...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the surgical operation of the nanodrug delivery system still belongs to laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, in addition to inheriting the advantages of minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery, it has some unique advantages [ 18 ]. The terminal organs of the nanodrug surgery system have multiple functions, allowing the operator performs complex surgical operations in a small space.…”
Section: Methods Of Research On the Impact Of Urinary Tract Injury Du...mentioning
confidence: 99%