2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive triple valve surgery through a right minithoracotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this series, cardiopulmonary bypass times (median 166 minutes) are similar to those observed within our institution in patients who underwent TVS utilizing an open approach without other concomitant cardiac procedures, such as CABG (median 168 minutes in seven patients, data not shown). Moreover, cross‐clamp times were similar, and actually slightly lower, in this cohort compared with our previous open patients with TVS (median 137 minutes), and is also lower than similar reports in the literature, which range from 131 to 181 minutes 6,8,11,12 . A study of double valve procedures by Atik et al 25 which used propensity scoring to match patients undergoing open and minimally invasive approaches showed that utilizing the minimally invasive approach did not prolong cross clamp time or total time on cardiopulmonary bypass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this series, cardiopulmonary bypass times (median 166 minutes) are similar to those observed within our institution in patients who underwent TVS utilizing an open approach without other concomitant cardiac procedures, such as CABG (median 168 minutes in seven patients, data not shown). Moreover, cross‐clamp times were similar, and actually slightly lower, in this cohort compared with our previous open patients with TVS (median 137 minutes), and is also lower than similar reports in the literature, which range from 131 to 181 minutes 6,8,11,12 . A study of double valve procedures by Atik et al 25 which used propensity scoring to match patients undergoing open and minimally invasive approaches showed that utilizing the minimally invasive approach did not prolong cross clamp time or total time on cardiopulmonary bypass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Our technique is similar to other previously described minimally invasive approaches, with important distinctions. One is that we place a venous cannula directly into the SVC and join it to the venous circuit which also has a femoral venous cannula 6,8‐11 . We do not utilize jugular cannulation as reported in the Rome approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We can only repeat our recommendation to attend specialized centers (5,25). In such centers, these procedures are even now part of the standard healthcare repertoire (20,31,32).…”
Section: Boxmentioning
confidence: 99%