2006
DOI: 10.1245/aso.2006.03.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy for Follicular Neoplasm: Is There an Advantage Over Conventional Thyroidectomy?

Abstract: MIVAT is as safe and effective as conventional thyroidectomy and is associated with similar narcotic analgesic requirements, but it can be performed through smaller incisions. Operative times were significantly longer for MIVAT, but when patients with thyroiditis were excluded, operative times were not significantly different.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While a variety of minimally invasive approaches have been endorsed, the technique most widely practiced in North America is the minimally invasive videoassisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT), as originally described by Miccoli et al 1 As with many new surgical techniques, adoption of MIVAT in the United States has been slow and somewhat deliberate. Increasingly, however, high-volume thyroid surgical centers have embraced this approach, and modest-sized case series 8,9 have been published detailing their experiences. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a variety of minimally invasive approaches have been endorsed, the technique most widely practiced in North America is the minimally invasive videoassisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT), as originally described by Miccoli et al 1 As with many new surgical techniques, adoption of MIVAT in the United States has been slow and somewhat deliberate. Increasingly, however, high-volume thyroid surgical centers have embraced this approach, and modest-sized case series 8,9 have been published detailing their experiences. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger series of clinical and comparative studies have demonstrated that this technique is reproducible and safe, with an incidence of postoperative complications similar to that reported for the conventional approach [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…13,19,[41][42][43][44][45][46] One of the reasons for this initial refusal is partly due to the technical difficulty of endoscopic resection, which requires adequate training both in open and endoscopic procedures before gland resection can be safely performed. 46 MIVAT has the potential to offer similar advantages over conventional thyroidectomy.…”
Section: Dovepressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, however, high-volume thyroid surgical centers have embraced this approach, and modest-sized case series have been published detailing their experiences. 18,19 In a more comprehensive reflection of the North American experience with MIVAT, consolidated data were compiled prospectively at 4 academic medical centers, paying specific attention to the safety and feasibility of this approach. 20.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%