Volume 7A: Structures and Dynamics 2016
DOI: 10.1115/gt2016-56721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimising Clearance Consumption: A Key Factor for the Design of Blades Robust to Rotor/Stator Interactions?

Abstract: The recent development of a numerical strategy dedicated to the simulation of rotor/stator interactions stemming from structural contacts in modern aircraft engines led to the first optimization of a high-pressure compressor blade profile accounting for criteria related to non-linear contact simulations. This optimization procedure revealed very significant improvements in terms of amplitudes of vibration but failed to identify key design parameters. Satisfying numerical results were obtained by a minor modifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22), blades L 50 and L 100 also lead to a slightly smaller dynamic clearance than the reference blade, S 50 and S 100 lead to a dramatic reduction in dynamic clearance, and CS 50 and CS 100 exhibit the same dynamic clearance as the reference blade. These observations are consistent with previous studies showing that smaller dynamic clearance is related to lower blade's responses to contact events [59], as S 50 and S 100 exhibit the largest decrease in dynamic clearance as well as the lowest radial and tangential displacements. It is important to note, however, that the reduction is particularly striking for the first torsion mode, while interactions seem to occur mainly with the first bending mode.…”
Section: Dynamic Clearancesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22), blades L 50 and L 100 also lead to a slightly smaller dynamic clearance than the reference blade, S 50 and S 100 lead to a dramatic reduction in dynamic clearance, and CS 50 and CS 100 exhibit the same dynamic clearance as the reference blade. These observations are consistent with previous studies showing that smaller dynamic clearance is related to lower blade's responses to contact events [59], as S 50 and S 100 exhibit the largest decrease in dynamic clearance as well as the lowest radial and tangential displacements. It is important to note, however, that the reduction is particularly striking for the first torsion mode, while interactions seem to occur mainly with the first bending mode.…”
Section: Dynamic Clearancesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Previous works have shown a relationship between a blade's robustness to contact events and its dynamic clearance, studied in details in [56] and investigated previously as the "clearance consumption" in [59]. The dynamic clearance quantifies the variation of the radial position of a given point on the blade tip as the blade vibrates along one of its free-vibration modes: large dynamic clearance means that vibration along the mode modifies significantly the blade/casing clearance.…”
Section: Dynamic Clearancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the stacking line, whose parameters are defined in Fig. 6, controls the blade tilt with the lean angle (15) and the sweep angle (16) and the blade curvature with the bowed distance (17). The hub radius (18) and the blade height (19) give the radial positions of the root profile and the tip profile.…”
Section: Stacking Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All other profile parameters are bound within a ±20% variation range. Finally, all extrusion parameters are constant but (17) the bowed distance that may vary within a ±20% variation range.…”
Section: Blade Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation