2012 Sixth International Conference on Electromagnetic Field Problems and Applications 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icef.2012.6310420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimization of Cogging Torque in Fractional-Slot Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine with Conventional Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paper extends the work done in [4] and [23]. In [4] the effect of the slot-openings on both parallel and trapezoidal-teeth stators was mentioned but not analysed, while in [23] the effect of slot-openings on trapezoidal-teeth stator was analysed.…”
Section: Ieee Transactions On Industrial Electronicsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The paper extends the work done in [4] and [23]. In [4] the effect of the slot-openings on both parallel and trapezoidal-teeth stators was mentioned but not analysed, while in [23] the effect of slot-openings on trapezoidal-teeth stator was analysed.…”
Section: Ieee Transactions On Industrial Electronicsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In [4] the effect of the slot-openings on both parallel and trapezoidal-teeth stators was mentioned but not analysed, while in [23] the effect of slot-openings on trapezoidal-teeth stator was analysed. In most cases as proposed in [4], [17], [18] and [24], slot-openings and slots are often displaced as a way of mitigating cogging torque, but not by optimizing their width.…”
Section: Ieee Transactions On Industrial Electronicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous methods for cogging torque reduction in PM machines are available in literature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. These methods may be classified under two categories, namely, stator modification techniques and rotor modification techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods may be classified under two categories, namely, stator modification techniques and rotor modification techniques. The former technique includes stator slot skewing [1][2][3], slot opening variation [1,4], tooth shaping [4], dummy slots/tooth [1], fractional slots per pole [1,9] and [10], etc. The later method comprises magnet shaping [5], optimizing magnet pole arc to pole pitch ratio [1], pole arc offset [6], narrowing rotor pole embrace [7], pole-slot combination [1,8], magnet skewing, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%