2021
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.5636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimization of constraint violation probability in model predictive control

Abstract: For Model Predictive Control in safety‐critical systems it is not only important to bound the probability of constraint violation but to reduce this constraint violation probability as much as possible. Therefore, an approach is necessary that minimizes the constraint violation probability while ensuring that the Model Predictive Control optimization problem remains feasible even under changing uncertainty. We propose a novel two‐step Model Predictive Control scheme that yields a solution with minimal constrai… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) Safe Case: Here the set U cvpm is (10) which is the intersection of the admissible input set U N and the set of input sequences that guarantee constraint satisfaction of (5). The set {−Axt} is a singleton that takes into account the current state xt and the set U cvpm is determined with algorithms from [35].…”
Section: A Cvpm-mpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1) Safe Case: Here the set U cvpm is (10) which is the intersection of the admissible input set U N and the set of input sequences that guarantee constraint satisfaction of (5). The set {−Axt} is a singleton that takes into account the current state xt and the set U cvpm is determined with algorithms from [35].…”
Section: A Cvpm-mpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, we prove recursive feasibility of the safe case, i.e., once the safe case is applicable, XcaseS is invariant under CVPM-MPC. For this purpose, the following assumption is required, which defines the terminal set in (5).…”
Section: Definition 4 (Recursive Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of recursive feasibility in SMPC formulations was early recognized [15]. Simple modifications include the relaxation of the corresponding chance constraints using penalties [9], [10], minimizing the probability of constraint violation [16], (iteratively) adjusting the probability level in the chance constraints [11], [17], or considering weaker discounted/weighted average probabilistic constraints [12], [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, guaranteeing recursive feasibility in the presence of uncertainty remains a challenge. An MPC approach to minimize constraint violation probability is proposed in [21], but the method is only applicable if norm-based constraints can be employed. In [22], [23] a predictive safety filter is proposed to guarantee safety in probability for reinforcement learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%