2012
DOI: 10.1163/016942411x574619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimization of Ice Adhesion to Space Shuttle Component Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ice formation on exterior surfaces has been a persistent nuisance and hazard for outdoor infrastructure such as offshore platforms, 1 asphalt roads and pavements, 2 power transmission lines, 3 aircraft parts (engines, wings, and tail), 4 wind turbines, 5 solar panels, 6 helicopter blades, 7 and even space shuttle components. 8 While ice removal is typically accomplished via active deicing techniques (thermal, mechanical, and/or chemical) that require continued reapplication, 9 recent advances in surface technologies have ushered in the development of so-called "ice-phobic" materials, whose interfacial properties either prevent ice formation, reduce its adhesion, or both. 3 The first approachpreventing ice formationmay be achieved by either fabricating nonwetting surfaces that repel impinging water droplets such that the surface remains dry, 10−13 or designing surfaces that delay ice nucleation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ice formation on exterior surfaces has been a persistent nuisance and hazard for outdoor infrastructure such as offshore platforms, 1 asphalt roads and pavements, 2 power transmission lines, 3 aircraft parts (engines, wings, and tail), 4 wind turbines, 5 solar panels, 6 helicopter blades, 7 and even space shuttle components. 8 While ice removal is typically accomplished via active deicing techniques (thermal, mechanical, and/or chemical) that require continued reapplication, 9 recent advances in surface technologies have ushered in the development of so-called "ice-phobic" materials, whose interfacial properties either prevent ice formation, reduce its adhesion, or both. 3 The first approachpreventing ice formationmay be achieved by either fabricating nonwetting surfaces that repel impinging water droplets such that the surface remains dry, 10−13 or designing surfaces that delay ice nucleation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variety of tests to measure adhesion and ice accretion are available, but there is no general agreement in terms of best practice or procedures. For ice adhesion, there are several tests based on the shear stress necessary to detach the formed ice (in unrealistic conditions) from the material [46], among which the most used are the zero degree cone test (ZDCT) [47] and the double lap shear test (DLST) [48]. Another type of tests is the cantilever/electroshaker type [49] in which the specimen is held at one end and subjected to vibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely known test, the ZDCT, consists of a shear load applied to a confined ice-substrate assembly (Haehnel and Mulherin 1998). In addition, CRREL developed the lap shear test for ice adhesion (Ferrick et al 2006a(Ferrick et al , 2006b). However, both tests have some shortcomings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%