1990
DOI: 10.1021/ac00207a018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimization of interferences in inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry using on-line preconcentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2A). In natural waters and wastewaters, colloidal and low‐molecular‐weight organic compounds often sequester analytes and must be destroyed by appropriate treatment prior to analysis [5,17–20]. Our experimental results clearly document the necessity of using UV irradiation as a digestion procedure prior to sample preconcentration (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…2A). In natural waters and wastewaters, colloidal and low‐molecular‐weight organic compounds often sequester analytes and must be destroyed by appropriate treatment prior to analysis [5,17–20]. Our experimental results clearly document the necessity of using UV irradiation as a digestion procedure prior to sample preconcentration (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…9,10 Since FIA, such as an on-line column system, has abilities to separate analytes from matrix elements and concentrate them, the technique serves for the determination of low-concentration elements, including a radionuclides, in environmental samples. 10,11 Recently, the on-line separation technique has been widely used in the field of environmental analysis because of the following advantages: reducing contamination caused by a closed system; a small volume of reagents and a small amount of sample; column reusability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, these authors improved performance by eluting upstream the column [97]; in this way, they increased signals by a factor of 10-15 and throughput 20-75 times. Heithmar et al [99] achieved an LOD of 0.002 lg/L. Valdes-Hevia et al [100] applied this methodology to crystals and obtained an LOD of 20 lg/L and an RSD of 1.5%.…”
Section: Preconcentration By Flow-injection Column Separation (Fi-cpsmentioning
confidence: 99%