2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-22912-1_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing Even-Mansour Ciphers for Sequential Indifferentiability (Without Key Schedules)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that, both [XDG22] and this paper build over [CS15b]. In fact, our result can be seen as a generalization of [XDG22], for larger key (key size ≥ rn-bit for r ≥ 1) and typical linear TWEAKEY schedules. Table 1.1 gives a comparison of the three results.…”
Section: Rounds Primitives Key Size Complex Boundsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that, both [XDG22] and this paper build over [CS15b]. In fact, our result can be seen as a generalization of [XDG22], for larger key (key size ≥ rn-bit for r ≥ 1) and typical linear TWEAKEY schedules. Table 1.1 gives a comparison of the three results.…”
Section: Rounds Primitives Key Size Complex Boundsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The indifferentiability of Even-Mansour ciphers has been an active area of research with a series of papers proving both indifferentiability [ABD + 13, LS13a, DSST17, GL16] and its sequential counterpart [CS15b,CS16,XDG22]. Interestingly though all these works, either consider a trivial key schedule, where the round keys are the same as the master key, and hence the master key size is same as the permutation input size, say n, or employ independent random oracles to derive the round keys from the master key.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this is insecure even w.r.t. seq-indifferentiability [XDG23]: by acting as the involved evaluations in all the t rounds, a single permutation-evaluation p(x) = y already yields a full t-round EMSP t enciphering y → (x, y) → ... → (x, y) t times → x with k = x ⊕ y. Xu et al [XDG23] thus only proved seq-indifferentiability for a 4-round IEM variant using 2 permutations, which still falls short of addressing the single permutation problem.…”
Section: Our Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%