1987
DOI: 10.1016/0020-0190(87)90145-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing mean weighted execution time loss on identical and uniform processors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, the preemptive case for identical as well as for a fixed number of uniform processors was considered. Blazewicz and Finke [86] have proposed a strongly polynomial algorithm based on a network flow technique, which minimizes the mean weighted execution time loss for an arbitrary number of identical processors as well as uniform processors. The upper bound on the number of preemptions in each of the cases is also reported.…”
Section: Miscellaneous Problem With Preemptive Jobsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the preemptive case for identical as well as for a fixed number of uniform processors was considered. Blazewicz and Finke [86] have proposed a strongly polynomial algorithm based on a network flow technique, which minimizes the mean weighted execution time loss for an arbitrary number of identical processors as well as uniform processors. The upper bound on the number of preemptions in each of the cases is also reported.…”
Section: Miscellaneous Problem With Preemptive Jobsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms cannot be applied directly to component tasks whose extension functions are not in the linear form given by (1) and (2). We now describe how to transform a given set of component tasks with arbitrary mandatory and optional extensions to another set with linear mandatory and optional extensions and thus find the error-scaling factors.…”
Section: Extracting Error-scaling Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hard realtime system must remain robust and maintain an acceptable level of performance under a transient overload. The imprecise-computation technique [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] was introduced as a way to deal with transient overloads. The technique is motivated by the fact that one can often trade off precision for timeliness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 2 reduces problem Q|r j , p j − x j , C j ≤ d j , pmtn| α j x j to maximizing a linear function over a generalized polymatroid which allows us to solve the problem in O(mn 4 ) time by network flow techniques, faster than the earlier approaches [3,12]. Section 3 addresses problem Q|p j − x j , C j ≤ d, pmtn| α j x j with equal release dates and a common due date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the processing times are controllable, problem Q|r j , p j − x j , C j ≤ d j , pmtn| α j x j as a model of imprecise computation is studied by Błažewicz and Finke [3] and Leung [12] and shown to be solvable in O(m 2 n 4 log mn + m 2 n 3 log 2 mn) and O(m 2 n 4 log mn) time, respectively. Nowicki and Zdrzalka [17] study problem Q|p j − x j , C j ≤ d, pmtn| α j x j with equal release dates and a common due date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%