2014
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20141247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing the Noise Contribution in Vertical Electric Field Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods of stabilization of receiving dipoles are constantly improving (Faynberg and Barsukov 2013). At the moment, the maximum tilt of receivers does not exceed ±0.1° ( Helwig et al 2013;Frafjord et al 2014). Such parameters of the VEB-E z (t) configuration guarantee the absence of distortion within 1% for offsets R = 0.5-3 km and sea depths of H w > 50 m and sediments resistivity to 7 Ωm caused by tilting of VEB and the receiver VED.…”
Section: T I L T S O F T H E E L E C T R I C L I N E S I N T H E Veb mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The methods of stabilization of receiving dipoles are constantly improving (Faynberg and Barsukov 2013). At the moment, the maximum tilt of receivers does not exceed ±0.1° ( Helwig et al 2013;Frafjord et al 2014). Such parameters of the VEB-E z (t) configuration guarantee the absence of distortion within 1% for offsets R = 0.5-3 km and sea depths of H w > 50 m and sediments resistivity to 7 Ωm caused by tilting of VEB and the receiver VED.…”
Section: T I L T S O F T H E E L E C T R I C L I N E S I N T H E Veb mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In both cases, the vertical component needs to be derived by a linear combination of at least three measured electrical fields as the seafloor can't be expected to be perfectly flat. Frafjord et al (2014) showed that the differences in noise between a true vertical recording and a mathematically rotated one can be significant as the horizontal E-field components are typically much noisier than the vertical component. Designs with gravitational verticality alignment, based on a hinged dipole with a large weight on the bottom (Kjerstad 2010), are impractical for larger operations due to their size and weight .…”
Section: Receiver Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frafjord et al . () showed that the differences in noise between a true vertical recording and a mathematically rotated one can be significant as the horizontal E‐field components are typically much noisier than the vertical component. Designs with gravitational verticality alignment, based on a hinged dipole with a large weight on the bottom (Kjerstad ), are impractical for larger operations due to their size and weight (Helwig et al .…”
Section: Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consagrado, inclusive, por estudos substanciais para indicação direta de hidrocarbonetos (Sainson, 2012), o mCSEM (marine Controlled Source ElectroMagnetic) teve sua configuração de aquisição alterada por uma empresa norueguesa -Petromarker -afim de melhorar a resolução vertical e promover uma maior distinção entre corpos condutivos e resistivos (Frafjork et al, 2014;Holten et al, 2009a). Além de alterações instrumentais, a metodologia recebeu a mnemônica nomenclatura de VME (Vertical Marine Electromagnetic) e foi patenteada sob o nome TEMP-VEL (Transient ElectroMagnetic Prospecting with Vertical Electric Lines) (Gloux & Holten, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified