2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-015-0182-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing the radiation dose of CT attenuation correction while improving image quality: The case for innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, while VECACS is inherently subjective there seems to be reasonable accuracy and interobserver agreement. The radiation exposure from CTAC (<1mSv) is lower compared to dedicated CAC scanning which average ~ 1 mSv [37] , [38] . However, both are associated with relatively low radiation exposure compared to a 1-day myocardial rest stress study using Tc-99 m sestamibi (~9 mSv) [39] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, while VECACS is inherently subjective there seems to be reasonable accuracy and interobserver agreement. The radiation exposure from CTAC (<1mSv) is lower compared to dedicated CAC scanning which average ~ 1 mSv [37] , [38] . However, both are associated with relatively low radiation exposure compared to a 1-day myocardial rest stress study using Tc-99 m sestamibi (~9 mSv) [39] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Gadolinium-153 is used in nuclear medicine as part of a line tracer in SPECT imaging [1][2][3], where attenuation corrections must be known on a patient-by-patient basis. Historically it has been used in bone absorptiometry [4][5][6], to study bone mineral density and to help diagnosis of osteoporosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%