2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-021-06411-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing the total completion time on a multi-machine FMS using flower pollination algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With five jobs and thirteen operations, job-set number five was considered. Thus, the solution vector, which used job operation, MC, tool, and AGV-based coding, had 13 The created solutions for the initial population stuck to the precedence rules, making them viable solutions. All potential population replacement candidates were chosen for every generation.…”
Section: Limit and Bound Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With five jobs and thirteen operations, job-set number five was considered. Thus, the solution vector, which used job operation, MC, tool, and AGV-based coding, had 13 The created solutions for the initial population stuck to the precedence rules, making them viable solutions. All potential population replacement candidates were chosen for every generation.…”
Section: Limit and Bound Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The schedule obtained from the scheduling of MCs and tools with a single copy of every tool type were not be implemented because job transfer times were not considered. To decrease the tooling cost and implement the schedule, Narapureddy et al [12], Sivarami Reddy et al [13], and Sivarami Reddy et al [14] addressed the scheduling of MCs, AGVs, and tools with a copy of every tool type considering the job transfer times using CSA, FPA, and SOSA, respectively. Tool transfer times were not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ulusoy et al develop a genetic algorithm to schedule AGVs and machines simultaneously (Gündüz et al, 1997), reaching the lower bound in sixty percent of the test problems. Reddy et al propose a nonlinear mixed integer programming formulation to model the simultaneous scheduling problem of machines, AGVs and tools (Reddy et al,2021). Rahman et al propose a heuristic and metaheuristic-based integrated decision approach to solve robotic assembly line balancing problem and AGV scheduling problem simultaneously (Rahman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%