2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing UV noise in supercritical fluid chromatography. I. Improving back pressure regulator pressure noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As with post column temperature optimization, any pressure noise induced by the BPR will result in RI variations in any UV-Vis detector flow cell, and detector noise [14]. Some modern BPR's can control back pressure to <±0.05 bar (0.75 psi) at 200 bar, resulting in remarkably low pressure induced noise.…”
Section: Pressure Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with post column temperature optimization, any pressure noise induced by the BPR will result in RI variations in any UV-Vis detector flow cell, and detector noise [14]. Some modern BPR's can control back pressure to <±0.05 bar (0.75 psi) at 200 bar, resulting in remarkably low pressure induced noise.…”
Section: Pressure Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this weakness, two of the most important providers of chromatographic instrumentation (Agilent and Waters) developed a new generation of analytical SFC instruments, allowing comparable sensitivity and robustness to that of HPLC [10][11][12]. In parallel, polar stationary phases packed with core-shell sub-3 m particles [13] or fully porous sub-2 m particles [14][15][16][17] compatible with supercritical conditions have been commercialized, enabling a user to achieve kinetic performance comparable and sometimes even better than in LC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Customized instrumentation allowed many of these shortcomings to be overcome [18,19] but required expert solutions. Consequently, many laboratories carrying out GMP testing of stereoisomeric mixtures currently use traditional normal phase or reversed phase chiral chromatographic methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%