2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(00)00056-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing WIP inventory in reliable production lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, L max and i ≥ 1. Finally, part (i) of Lemma 1 and equations (25) and (29) give inequality (34), since u j, = u (K ,M) j, for j = M + 1, . .…”
Section: Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, L max and i ≥ 1. Finally, part (i) of Lemma 1 and equations (25) and (29) give inequality (34), since u j, = u (K ,M) j, for j = M + 1, . .…”
Section: Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, pooling several stations at the end of the line usually yields a better WIP when systems with the same number of stations after pooling are compared. We believe that this is due to the facts that in such cases, the jobs are pushed out of the system more effectively and the added buffers are closer to the end of the line (see So [29] and Papadopoulos and Vidalis [25]). …”
Section: Pooling In Balanced Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WIP is defined as the amount of work left in the semi finished product. We have studied how WWAL incorporates better worker utilization and reduction of WIP [4]. In this paper, we are going to focus on optimization of manual mechanical assembling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic algorithms belong for example to metaheuristics which can be applied to solve buffers sizing problems (Dolgui et al, 2002), (Hamada et al, 2006). Simulated Annealing is another method applied in many works (Spinellis et al, 2000), (Papadopoulos & Vidalis, 2001). The literature presents also other methods such as neural networks (Altiparmak et al, 2002) or Tabu search (Lutz et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%