2012
DOI: 10.1179/pan.2012.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum Analytical Nodules and Late Paleoindian Cody Complex Lithic Technological Organization at Hell Gap, Wyoming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Over time, stone might be worked and discarded locally, or it might move in or out of an assemblage as either unworked raw material or reduction products (i.e., cores or flakes). Knell (2012) illustrates five possible scenarios: Raw material is reduced and discarded in the local assemblage area.Raw material is reduced in the assemblage area, and some products are removed from the assemblage.Raw material is imported and worked in the assemblage area, potentially breaking and being discarded locally or being transported away as finished artifacts.Finished artifacts are carried into the assemblage area, are maintained through retouch, and are then removed from the assemblage area.Finished artifacts are carried into the assemblage area and discarded there.…”
Section: The Cortex Ratio As An Indicator Of Archaeological Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, stone might be worked and discarded locally, or it might move in or out of an assemblage as either unworked raw material or reduction products (i.e., cores or flakes). Knell (2012) illustrates five possible scenarios: Raw material is reduced and discarded in the local assemblage area.Raw material is reduced in the assemblage area, and some products are removed from the assemblage.Raw material is imported and worked in the assemblage area, potentially breaking and being discarded locally or being transported away as finished artifacts.Finished artifacts are carried into the assemblage area, are maintained through retouch, and are then removed from the assemblage area.Finished artifacts are carried into the assemblage area and discarded there.…”
Section: The Cortex Ratio As An Indicator Of Archaeological Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technological study was implemented by Raw Material Units analysis (RMU) (also known as MANA: Minimum Analytical Nodule Analysis in American literature), in addition to an intensive program of refits based on the material, in order to identify the technical events from a spatio-temporal perspective (RMU: Chacón et al 2015;Cziesla 1990;López-Ortega et al 2011;2015;Machado et al 2013;2015;Marciani 2013;Roebroeks 1988;Romagnoli 2012;Schurmans 2007;Spagnolo 2013;Spagnolo et al 2016;Uthmeier 2006;Vallverdù et al 2010;Vaquero 2008;Vaquero et al 2001;2012a;2012b;2015;MANA: Bruce 2001;Byrnes 2009;Cooper & Melzer 2009;Douglass 2010;Hall 2004;Hall & Larson 2004;Hurst et al 2010;Knell 2012;Larson 1994;Larson & Ingbar 1992;Larson & Finley 2004;Larson & Kornfeld 1997;Miller 2016;Scerri et al 2016;White 2012;Yoshikawa 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larson, Kornfeld 1997;Inizan et al 1999, Fig. 3;Knell 2012;Damlien 2016). Larson and Kornfeld (1997, p. 13, Table 2) describe different scenarios affecting the technological organisation mirrored in lithic assemblages.…”
Section: Part Of Production Processmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, our analysis has produced evidence that blank and tool production, and in some cases initial core preparation, was performed at Laukskola, while at the same time it is likely that some import to the site of readymade blades and tools took place. We interpret this as a manner to counteract uncertainty or deficiency in raw material availability (Knell 2012;Damlien 2016, e.g. p. 399;Berg-Hansen 2017a, pp.168-173).…”
Section: Part Of Production Processmentioning
confidence: 99%