2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10816-022-09563-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum Animal Units and the Standardized Count Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 81 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NISP is one of the two most common proxies for specimen abundance in zooarchaeology and is more consistently reported globally than others (e.g. minimum number of individuals, minimum number of elements, minimum animal units) [148,[152][153][154]. It is accepted that NISP is an imperfect proxy for the historic abundance of fauna; it is key to note that NISP is subject to numerous biases, including, but not exclusively, problems associated with differential fragmentation and transportation [148].…”
Section: Data Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…NISP is one of the two most common proxies for specimen abundance in zooarchaeology and is more consistently reported globally than others (e.g. minimum number of individuals, minimum number of elements, minimum animal units) [148,[152][153][154]. It is accepted that NISP is an imperfect proxy for the historic abundance of fauna; it is key to note that NISP is subject to numerous biases, including, but not exclusively, problems associated with differential fragmentation and transportation [148].…”
Section: Data Typementioning
confidence: 99%