2005
DOI: 10.1191/0959683605hl808rr
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum count sums for charcoal concentration estimates in pollen slides: accuracy and potential errors

Abstract: Charcoal particles in pollen slides are often abundant, and thus analysts are faced with the problem of setting the minimum counting sum as small as possible in order to save time. We analysed the reliability of charcoal-concentration estimates based on different counting sums, using simulated low-to high-count samples. Bootstrap simulations indicate that the variability of inferred charcoal concentrations increases progressively with decreasing sums. Below 200 items (i.e., the sum of charcoal particles and ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
127
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microscopic charcoal was counted in the pollen slides with a light microscope at 250× magnification following Tinner and Hu (2003) and Finsinger and Tinner (2005); charcoal concentration (#/cm 3 ) is calculated in proportion to the Lycopodium grains added to the samples. Influx values (#/cm 2 /yr) derive from sedimentation accumulation rates (SAR) estimated with the age-depth model.…”
Section: Charcoal Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscopic charcoal was counted in the pollen slides with a light microscope at 250× magnification following Tinner and Hu (2003) and Finsinger and Tinner (2005); charcoal concentration (#/cm 3 ) is calculated in proportion to the Lycopodium grains added to the samples. Influx values (#/cm 2 /yr) derive from sedimentation accumulation rates (SAR) estimated with the age-depth model.…”
Section: Charcoal Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One numerically determined, but statistically not significant zone limit was retained, because it was judged ecologically meaningful. Microscopic charcoal particles[10 lm were counted on the pollen slides following Tinner and Hu (2003) and Finsinger and Tinner (2005). Concentrations (particles cm -3 ) and influx (particles cm -2 per year) were estimated using the same approach as for pollen.…”
Section: Pollen and Charcoal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charcoal particles longer than 10 mm were identified in the pollen slides with a light microscope at ×250 magnification. Charcoal was identified as black, completely opaque, angular fragments and at least 200 objects were counted for each sample (Tinner and Hu 2003;Finsinger and Tinner 2005). Rarefaction analysis using the program RAREPOLL (Birks and Line 1992) was carried out using the raw count to estimate the palynological richness, the lowest pollen count (410 grains) was used as the reference sum.…”
Section: Pollen and Microscopic Charcoal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%