2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00184-017-0614-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum distance estimators for count data based on the probability generating function with applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature related to the so-called "goodness-of-fit" inferential setting is huge (e.g., [30] or, more recently, [24] and [21]) and suitable test statistics for assessing (1) are often based on the properties of the probability generating function (p.g.f.) (e.g., [31], [32], [25], [17], [4], [29]). Meintainis and Nikitin [26] have proposed families of consistent test statistics for Poissonity based on differential equations concerning the p.g.f.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature related to the so-called "goodness-of-fit" inferential setting is huge (e.g., [30] or, more recently, [24] and [21]) and suitable test statistics for assessing (1) are often based on the properties of the probability generating function (p.g.f.) (e.g., [31], [32], [25], [17], [4], [29]). Meintainis and Nikitin [26] have proposed families of consistent test statistics for Poissonity based on differential equations concerning the p.g.f.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…against alternatives belonging to a large family. In a more general framework, Jiménez-Gamero and Batsidis [17] presented a test statistic based on a distance between the empirical p.g.f. and the p.g.f.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the specific small portion of data is sufficient for testing purposes is due to the fact that this part of the data is associated with a tail characterization that distinguishes exponential and non-exponential distributions. As opposed to classical tests (see e.g., Baratpour and Rad 2012;Huber-Carol et al 2002;Jimenez-Gamero and Batsidis 2017;Novikov et al 2015;Rogozhnikov and Lemeshko 2012;Vonta et al 2012), in this work, the emphasis is placed exclusively on the tail by ignoring the rest of the distribution. It should be noted that although classical tests based on the entire dataset often fail to reject a null hypothesis, the proposed testing procedure checks the fit of the tail and makes a decision exclusively on the available data from the extreme part of the distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We often state that divergences measure the discrepancy between two probability distributions or the information needed in order to distinguish one from the other. There is plethora of estimators and hypothesis tests associated with such measures for several cases [3,4], many tests of fit based on measures of divergence and take into account dissimilarities between the distributions involved [5] or based on maximum entropy principle [6]. Also, model selection criteria [7][8][9] are based on such type of information measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%