2009
DOI: 10.1080/09592310802573657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Minimum Force’: a reply to Huw Bennett

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2The debate about “minimum force” played out in similar ways at the beginning of the 1990s and again at the end of the 2000s, mainly in the pages of the Small Wars & Insurgencies journal. For the main interventions, see: Mockaitis, British Counterinsurgency ; Newsinger, “Minimum Force”; Mockaitis, “Minimum Force: A Reply”; Thornton, “British Army and the Origins”; Bennett, “The Other Side of the COIN”; Thornton, “‘Minimum Force’: A Reply to Huw Bennett.”…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2The debate about “minimum force” played out in similar ways at the beginning of the 1990s and again at the end of the 2000s, mainly in the pages of the Small Wars & Insurgencies journal. For the main interventions, see: Mockaitis, British Counterinsurgency ; Newsinger, “Minimum Force”; Mockaitis, “Minimum Force: A Reply”; Thornton, “British Army and the Origins”; Bennett, “The Other Side of the COIN”; Thornton, “‘Minimum Force’: A Reply to Huw Bennett.”…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%