2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017wr020418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum Hydraulic Resistance and Least Resistance Path in Heterogeneous Porous Media

Abstract: The transport dynamics of a solute plume in porous media are strictly related to the hydrogeological properties. Despite progress in simulation techniques, quantifying transport in strongly heterogeneous geological formations is still a challenge. It is well established that the heterogeneity of the hydraulic conductivity (K) field is one of the main factors controlling solute transport phenomena. Increasing the heterogeneity level of the K‐field will enhance the probability of having preferential paths, that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In hydrology and many water-related disciplines, the distribution of permeability k in the subsurface is crucial for conducting a flow analysis, for example, to assess the aquifer performance under different water usage scenarios (Paniconi & Putti, 2015), to predict the organic solute plume front in contaminated sites (e.g., Rizzo & de Barros, 2017), and to evaluate different waterflooding strategies to recovery additional oils from reservoirs (e.g., Friesen et al, 2017). The permeability of a rock is primarily controlled by its texture (e.g., porosity, particle/pore size, sorting, and surface area) and mineralogy, and it can vary over several orders of magnitude (e.g., Brace, 1980) owing to the heterogeneous nature of the rock (Honarpour et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In hydrology and many water-related disciplines, the distribution of permeability k in the subsurface is crucial for conducting a flow analysis, for example, to assess the aquifer performance under different water usage scenarios (Paniconi & Putti, 2015), to predict the organic solute plume front in contaminated sites (e.g., Rizzo & de Barros, 2017), and to evaluate different waterflooding strategies to recovery additional oils from reservoirs (e.g., Friesen et al, 2017). The permeability of a rock is primarily controlled by its texture (e.g., porosity, particle/pore size, sorting, and surface area) and mineralogy, and it can vary over several orders of magnitude (e.g., Brace, 1980) owing to the heterogeneous nature of the rock (Honarpour et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of static and dynamic connectivity metrics have been proposed (Fernàndez-Garcia et al, 2010;Fiori, 2014;Fiori & Jankovic, 2012;Freixas et al, 2017;Knudby & Carrera, 2005;Renard & Allard, 2013;Trinchero et al, 2008;Tyukhova & Willmann, 2016a, 2016bWillmann et al, 2008). In the recent work of Rizzo and de Barros (2017), for instance, the connectivity of the K field is quantified with a static metric based on the identification of paths of least resistance (Tyukhova & Willmann, 2016a), which is subsequently shown to be correlated to the early arrival times of a solute plume. Connectivity is closely related to the concepts of percolation and critical path analysis (e.g., Harter, 2005;Hunt & Sahimi, 2017;Stauffer & Aharony, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of well‐connected paths on solute transport has been extensively studied in the hydrogeological community (e.g., Fiori et al, ; ; Fogg et al, ; Knudby & Carrera, ; Rizzo & de Barros, ; Sánchez‐Vila et al, ; Trinchero et al, ; Tyukhova et al, ; ; Western et al, ). Implications of aquifer connectivity in the probabilistic assessment of increased lifetime cancer risk due to the exposure of chlorinated solvents is also reported in the literature (Henri et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For additional details on different connectivity metrics, we refer the reader to Knudby and Carrera () and Renard and Allard (). In this paper, we focus on a static quantity denoted as the minimum hydraulic resistance ( MHR ) and the corresponding least resistance path ( LRP ; Rizzo & de Barros, ; Tyukhova & Willmann, ). The MHR and the LRP are solely based on the K ‐field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%