2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31265-6_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum Leaf Removal for Reconciliation: Complexity and Algorithms

Abstract: Abstract. Reconciliation is a well-known method for studying the evolution of a gene family through speciation, duplication, and loss. Unfortunately, the inferred history strongly depends on the considered gene tree for the gene family, as a few misplaced leaves can lead to a completely different history, possibly with significantly more duplications and losses. It is therefore essential to develop methods that are able to preprocess and correct gene trees prior to reconciliation. In this paper, we consider a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evolutionary scenarios under this model can be computed efficiently by algorithms that are implemented in various software packages (Górecki and Tiuryn, 2007;Chaudhary et al, 2010), and despite its simplicity appear to have produced some credible evolutionary studies for small rates of gene duplication and loss events (e.g., Page, 2000;Page and Cotton, 2002;Martin and Burg, 2002;Sanderson and McMahon, 2007). Subsequent programs based on variations of the parsimony model have attempted to improve biological realism (e.g., error correction of the given trees and unrooted gene trees) (Chaudhary et al, 2012;Dondi and El-Mabrouk, 2012;Górecki and Eulenstein, 2012). Moreover, many higher level approaches in evolutionary biology are based on this model, which includes the estimation of gene duplication episodes (e.g., Bansal and Eulenstein, 2008;Burleigh et al, 2009) and supertree inference (e.g., Wehe et al, 2008).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutionary scenarios under this model can be computed efficiently by algorithms that are implemented in various software packages (Górecki and Tiuryn, 2007;Chaudhary et al, 2010), and despite its simplicity appear to have produced some credible evolutionary studies for small rates of gene duplication and loss events (e.g., Page, 2000;Page and Cotton, 2002;Martin and Burg, 2002;Sanderson and McMahon, 2007). Subsequent programs based on variations of the parsimony model have attempted to improve biological realism (e.g., error correction of the given trees and unrooted gene trees) (Chaudhary et al, 2012;Dondi and El-Mabrouk, 2012;Górecki and Eulenstein, 2012). Moreover, many higher level approaches in evolutionary biology are based on this model, which includes the estimation of gene duplication episodes (e.g., Bansal and Eulenstein, 2008;Burleigh et al, 2009) and supertree inference (e.g., Wehe et al, 2008).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We presented algorithmic results for removing, from a given gene tree, the minimum number of leaves or leaf-labels (species) leading to a tree without a NAD vertex, under conditions of a known or an unknown species tree [16,53]. All known formulations of this version of the problem are NP-hard [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we present algorithmic results for removing, for a given gene tree (or a forest of gene trees), the minimum number of leaves or leaf-labels (species) leading to a tree without any NAD vertex, in both cases of a known or an unknown species tree. The minimum leaf removal problem in case of a known species tree has been recently proved to be APX-hard [21]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%