2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum length scale control in structural topology optimization based on the Moving Morphable Components (MMC) approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to deal with this constraint, we discretize 0 with a set of points ∈ 0 ∩ D, = 1, … , and impose the constraints on these points (i.e., = 0 • − cos ̅ ≤ 0, = 1, … , ). For the sake of reducing the computational effort, these constraints are aggregate into an equivalent single global constraint function as in [17]. Actually, = 0 • − cos ̅ ≤ 0, = 1, … , is fully equivalent to…”
Section: Treatment Of Geometry Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to deal with this constraint, we discretize 0 with a set of points ∈ 0 ∩ D, = 1, … , and impose the constraints on these points (i.e., = 0 • − cos ̅ ≤ 0, = 1, … , ). For the sake of reducing the computational effort, these constraints are aggregate into an equivalent single global constraint function as in [17]. Actually, = 0 • − cos ̅ ≤ 0, = 1, … , is fully equivalent to…”
Section: Treatment Of Geometry Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our motivation is from the consideration that since the constraints associated with the designing of self-supporting structures (e.g., overhang angle, minimum length scale) are actually geometrical in nature, it seems more appropriate to include more geometry information in the mathematical formulation of the considered problem and perform topology optimization in an geometrically explicit way (it is worth noting that topological design is usually achieved in an implicit way in tradition solution approaches such as variable density method and level set method, see [24][25][26][27][28][29] for more detailed discussions on this aspect). Recent years witnessed a growing interest in solving topology optimization problems by optimizing a set of geometrical parameters explicitly (i.e., a revival of shape optimization) [17,[24][25][26][27][28][29]. In particular, the so-called Moving Morphable Components (MMC) and Moving Morphable Voids (MMV) where a set of components (in MMC) or voids (in MMV) are used as basic building blocks of optimization have been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving components with variable thickness are used in [71], and the esartz material model is employed to enhance computational e ciency. In the work of Zhang et al [65] length scale control is achieved by directly controlling the component's minimal thickness. In Deng et al [12] the MMC approach is successfully implemented to solve various types of problems, like the design of compliant mechanisms and of low-frequency resonating micro devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the Moving Morphable Components (MMC) approach (Guo et al 2014a) with trapezoidal components, a different notion of minimum length scale considering the individual sizes of the components and the sizes of their intersection regions was introduced by Zhang et al (2016).…”
Section: Overview On Minimum Length Scale Control In Density Based Tomentioning
confidence: 99%