2023
DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i2.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum platelet count threshold before invasive procedures in cirrhosis: Evolution of the guidelines

Abstract: Cirrhotic patients with severe thrombocytopenia are at increased risk of bleeding during invasive procedures. The need for preprocedural prophylaxis aimed at reducing the risk of bleeding in cirrhotic patients with thrombocytopenia who undergo scheduled procedures is assessed via the platelet count; however, establishing a minimum threshold considered safe is challenging. A platelet count ≥ 50000/μL is a frequent target, but levels vary by provider, procedure, and specific patient. Over … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 126 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings, which suggest heightened bleeding risks in patients with platelet counts below this threshold, are consistent with these guidelines. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), however, indicates that there is no established minimum threshold for diagnostic upper GI endoscopy, with some authors suggesting 20,000/mL as a safe lower limit [9][10][11]. The disparity in these recommendations highlights the need for a personalized approach, considering individual patient risks and the nature of the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings, which suggest heightened bleeding risks in patients with platelet counts below this threshold, are consistent with these guidelines. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), however, indicates that there is no established minimum threshold for diagnostic upper GI endoscopy, with some authors suggesting 20,000/mL as a safe lower limit [9][10][11]. The disparity in these recommendations highlights the need for a personalized approach, considering individual patient risks and the nature of the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%