2017
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2017.2729417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum-Reactive-Power Scheme of Dual-Active-Bridge DC–DC Converter With Three-Level Modulated Phase-Shift Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, substituting (13) (14) into (17), the transmission power under proposed AMS can be described as:…”
Section: The Influence Of Proposed Ams Strategy On Mdct Performamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, substituting (13) (14) into (17), the transmission power under proposed AMS can be described as:…”
Section: The Influence Of Proposed Ams Strategy On Mdct Performamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, with the largescale configuration of the distributed power sources, energy storage and plug-and-play load devices in DC distribution network, the variation of power flow and loads cause the fluctuation of DC voltages [13]. Thus, similar with other DC transformers, the high-frequency-link (HFL) voltages in MDCT are not always match HFL transformer voltage ratio, leading to increased reactive power, large current stress and decreased efficiency in MDCT, hindering the widespread application of MDCT in DC distribution networks [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large body of literature exists that tries to answer the following question: For a given active power, how to set these three degrees of freedom so that rms of the winding currents or the conduction loss in the bridges and transformer can be minimized while satisfying the soft-switching conditions [13]- [14][15] [16]. Some authors aimed at the minimization of the reactive component of power, which is closely related to the conduction loss [17]- [18] [19].…”
Section: Section I Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the bidirectional DC-DC converters, dual-active-bridge (DAB) topology is one of the best options for renewable energy applications because of its benefits such as insulation, high reliability, ease of realising soft-switching control, simple topology and bidirectional energy flow [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. In general, the most common control methods for such a topology are the conventional single phase-shift (SPS) control and dual phase-shift (DPS) control [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. According to the SPS control scheme, the gate signals are phase shifted in the corresponding switches of the primary and the secondary sides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This control method features the simplicity. However, it suffers from limited flexibility since one phase-shift variable cannot take other considerations such as circulation loss, current stress, soft switch and reverse power flow [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The DPS control scheme includes the first phase shift between the primary side and secondary side as well as the second phase shift between the two bridge legs of the primary side to reduce the converter circulating current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%