Minimum Standards for Residential Accommodation (MSRA) and the Housing Welfare Policy – Focusing on the ’Housing Comprehensive Plan’

김준형,

doi:10.17208/jkpa.2015.06.50.4.185

“…He proposed additional countermeasures, incorporating social and economic criteria [15]. Kim [16] reviewed the composition and utilization plans of the 2011 revised minimum housing standards and the Long-term Comprehensive Housing Planning of cities and provinces. The aim was to propose directions for improving minimum housing standards to utilize them as tools for housing welfare policies [16].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Kim [16] reviewed the composition and utilization plans of the 2011 revised minimum housing standards and the Long-term Comprehensive Housing Planning of cities and provinces. The aim was to propose directions for improving minimum housing standards to utilize them as tools for housing welfare policies [16]. Lim [17] mentioned that South Korea's minimum housing standards lack effectiveness in enabling the state to take minimal protective measures.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Study on Recommendations for Improving Minimum Housing Standards

Kim,

Sim,

Kim

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Minimum housing standards aim to safeguard housing rights and enhance residential conditions. Governments develop housing policies, including provision, preservation, and support for welfare programs, guided by the status of households below these standards. Growing nations commonly utilize this approach to decrease the proportion of households not meeting these criteria. In South Korea, the ratio of households below these standards was 4.5% in 2021, down from 16.6% in 2006, as indicated by the initial Korea Housing Survey. However, this downward trend has stalled over the past decade. With the 2004 and 2011 revisions, the standards have been effective for 12 years, yet no longer mirror current housing realities due to ongoing improvements. This study aimed to propose enhancements to Korea’s minimum housing standards. Through analyzing laws, prior research, present household statuses, international cases, and expert insights, recommendations emerged. Categorizing households by size, we developed precise standards covering area, facility, and location aspects. These new standards led to an 8.4% non-compliance rate in 2021. This research’s findings anticipate aiding the revision of minimum housing standards, formulating pragmatic policies for enhancing residential conditions in line with present situations.

show abstract

“…He proposed additional countermeasures, incorporating social and economic criteria [21]. Kim [22] reviewed the composition and utilization plans of the 2011 revised minimum housing standards and the Longterm Comprehensive Housing Planning of cities and provinces. The aim was to propose directions for improving minimum housing standards to utilize them as tools for housing welfare policies [22].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Kim [22] reviewed the composition and utilization plans of the 2011 revised minimum housing standards and the Longterm Comprehensive Housing Planning of cities and provinces. The aim was to propose directions for improving minimum housing standards to utilize them as tools for housing welfare policies [22]. Lim [23] mentioned that South Korea's minimum housing standards lack effectiveness in enabling the state to take minimal protective measures.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Study on Recommendations for Improving Minimum Housing Standards

Kim,

Kim

2023

Preprint

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Minimum housing standards aim to safeguard housing rights and enhance residential conditions. Governments develop housing policies, including provision, preservation, and support for welfare programs, guided by the status of households below these standards. Growing nations commonly utilize this approach to decrease the proportion of households not meeting these criteria. In South Korea, the ratio of households below these standards was 4.5% in 2021, down from 16.6% in 2006, as indicated by the initial Korea Housing Survey. However, this downward trend has stalled over the past decade. With the 2004 and 2011 revisions, the standards have been effective for 12 years, yet no longer mirror current housing realities due to ongoing improvements. This study aimed to propose enhancements to Korea’s minimum housing standards. Through analyzing laws, prior research, present household statuses, international cases, and expert insights, recommendations emerged. Categorizing households by size, we developed precise standards covering area, facility, and location aspects. These new standards led to an 8.4% non-compliance rate in 2021. This research’s findings anticipate aiding the revision of minimum housing standards, formulating pragmatic policies for enhancing residential conditions in line with present situations.

show abstract