2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2010.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum zone evaluation of conicity error using minimum potential energy algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno Algorithm (BFGS) [49,126,136,144] is one of the most famous quasi-Newton algorithms for unconstrained optimization. Moving away from deterministic algorithms, intelligence-oriented algorithms (Genetic algorithms, Swarm algorithms) [97,173,179,180] with their simplicity are another way to search the solution of extreme problems with many local minima. An optimization toolbox has been implemented in Matlab software for solving complex optimization problems.…”
Section: Least Squares Methods (Lsm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno Algorithm (BFGS) [49,126,136,144] is one of the most famous quasi-Newton algorithms for unconstrained optimization. Moving away from deterministic algorithms, intelligence-oriented algorithms (Genetic algorithms, Swarm algorithms) [97,173,179,180] with their simplicity are another way to search the solution of extreme problems with many local minima. An optimization toolbox has been implemented in Matlab software for solving complex optimization problems.…”
Section: Least Squares Methods (Lsm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chatterjee and Roth 7 adopted a simplex search method for the vertices to achieve an optimum for Chebyshev fitting. Huang and Lee 21 implemented the form error evaluation using the minimum potential energy algorithm, which is stimulated by the techniques in mechanics. The calculated results of MZE by the PDIP method is equivalent to the results obtained by Chatterjee and Roth 7 and can obtain a little better result for Cone 2 in the study by Huang and Lee.…”
Section: Numerical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated results of MZE by the PDIP method is equivalent to the results obtained by Chatterjee and Roth 7 and can obtain a little better result for Cone 2 in the study by Huang and Lee. 21 As far as the authors know, there are no publications concerning the quantitative evaluation of form errors of cones in the sense of MCE and MIE yet, thus comparison cannot be undertaken for them. The results shown in Table 3 are to be verified and compared for the readers in the future.…”
Section: Numerical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, evolutionary algorithms are able to search the variable space more amply, but normally have a slower convergence rate. Recently, Huang and Lee evaluated the conicity error using minimum potential energy algorithms [21], which are very elaborate.…”
Section: Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%