Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2330601.2330637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mining academic data to improve college student retention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, we found the same statistically significant elements as Purdue with similar correlation strengths. These initial findings on portability were included in a paper presented at the 2012 international Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) conference (Lauría, Baron, Devireddy, Sundararaju, & Jayaprakash, 2012).…”
Section: Conducting Pilots Of the Academic Alert System At Partner Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, we found the same statistically significant elements as Purdue with similar correlation strengths. These initial findings on portability were included in a paper presented at the 2012 international Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) conference (Lauría, Baron, Devireddy, Sundararaju, & Jayaprakash, 2012).…”
Section: Conducting Pilots Of the Academic Alert System At Partner Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, students who infrequently participate in discussion forums and show patterns of disengagement are more likely to fail (Milne et al, 2012;Romero et al, 2013). The strength of the association ranges from weak (Lauría, Baron, Devireddy, Sundararaju, & Jayaprakash, 2012;Chanlin, 2012) to strong (Macfadyen & Dawson, 2010), and mere participation in discussion does not significantly distinguish students with the highest grades from average performers (Davies & Graff, 2005). Furthermore, discussion participation matters most for students in danger of failing (Davies & Graff, 2005), most likely because the feeling of being supported makes struggling students more likely to persist (Romero et al, 2013).…”
Section: Factors Related To Achievement In Online Coursesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another very popular classification method, C4.5 decision trees (Quinlan, 1993) have been used to predict student retention multiple times in recent literature such as in Yadav, Bharadwaj, and Pal (2012), Nandeshwar, Menzies, and Nelson (2011), Lauría (2012), and Lin (2012. This method works by building a tree structure where split operations are performed on each node based on information gain values for each feature of the dataset and the respective class.…”
Section: C45 Decision Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this division, new instances can be easily verified to belong to one of the two classes. This approach has been used to predict student retention, and has often achieved highly accurate results (Luna, 2000;Fike & Fike, 2008;Lauría, 2012;Lin, Imbrie, & Reid, 2009;Zhang, Anderson, Ohland, & Thorndyke, 2004;Herzog, 2006;Veenstra, Dey, & Herrin, 2009). …”
Section: Logistic Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%