2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2022.102101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mining cell–cell signaling in single-cell transcriptomics atlases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression patterns of the aforementioned genes in various cell types were visualized based on the UMAP plot and tSNE plot. Furthermore, a detailed examination of key cellular subgroups was carried out to identify receptor and ligand expression at the individual cell level, providing a clear understanding of intricate interactions in the cellular microenvironment [39,40]. Lastly, the identi ed key cell subgroups were screened and extracted for differential genes using the "FindMarkers" function (Threshold = 0.5) .…”
Section: Scrna-seq Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression patterns of the aforementioned genes in various cell types were visualized based on the UMAP plot and tSNE plot. Furthermore, a detailed examination of key cellular subgroups was carried out to identify receptor and ligand expression at the individual cell level, providing a clear understanding of intricate interactions in the cellular microenvironment [39,40]. Lastly, the identi ed key cell subgroups were screened and extracted for differential genes using the "FindMarkers" function (Threshold = 0.5) .…”
Section: Scrna-seq Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These databases serve as valuable resources for studying cell-to-cell communication and are often accompanied by published methods for inferring such interactions [175,177,181,182,187,[219][220][221]. They encompass a wide range of ligand-receptor interactions, ranging from several hundred to a few thousands [189,222], and are predominantly focused on human and mouse systems (with a couple of exceptions, such as FlyPhoneDB for Drosohpila [223] and PlatnPhoneDB for plants [224].) An interesting observation is that there appears to be a greater degree of similarity among databases in regards to their collection of ligands or receptors than their interactions with one another [189].…”
Section: Cell-cell Communication: Genes' Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative benchmarking has been reported for many of the available methods (including CEL-Seq2, MARS-Seq, Quartz-Seq2, gmcSCRB-seq, Smart-Seq2, C1HT-small, C1HT-medium, Chromium, ddSEQ, Drop-Seq, ICELL8, and inDrop) 8 10 . Major efforts using scRNA-seq have been applied to define atlases, notably for human and mouse cells 11 , 12 , with a potential for assessing cell–cell and virus-host interactions 13 , 14 facilitated by technical optimization of methodologies 8 , 15 . Other investigations have focused on specific organs, often in relation to pathologies 16 , especially cancer, immunotherapy, and cardiovascular diseases 17 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%