2006
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mining housekeeping genes with a Naive Bayes classifier

Abstract: Background: Traditionally, housekeeping and tissue specific genes have been classified using direct assay of mRNA presence across different tissues, but these experiments are costly and the results not easy to compare and reproduce.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C, D) Boxplots that display different degree of autosomal dosage compensation of the genes that are classified as housekeeping, or non-housekeeping based on the Naïve Bayes Classifier [40]. p values are from Mann-Whitney U tests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C, D) Boxplots that display different degree of autosomal dosage compensation of the genes that are classified as housekeeping, or non-housekeeping based on the Naïve Bayes Classifier [40]. p values are from Mann-Whitney U tests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, compared to all other islands in the SOM, we found that ES100 shows a more than 10-fold enrichment in segments that have a housekeeping probability 0.75 according to De Ferrari et al [34]. By contrast genes associated with high CpG-density and bivalent chromatin (H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 modified) in ESCs have been linked to genes with more complex expression patterns among them key developmental genes [11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…[15], [18], [28]). The HK set identified by Ramskold et al [6] was also treated as gold-standard, since it was derived from RNAseq experiments, which can detect expression signals more comprehensively and at a higher resolution than conventional microarray experiments [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lower TSI indicates a lower tendency for the gene to be TS (or a higher tendency for it to be HK). The 0.1 threshold was chosen following [16].eFor each gene, the Näive Bayes classifier [18] calculates a probability ( P ) of it being an HK gene; in this study, we choose those with a P value greater than 0.8 to be classified as HK genes.fAccording to [6], those genes with an RPKM (reads per kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads) score greater than 0.3 were classified as HK genes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%