2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20841-6_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mining Maximal Co-located Event Sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CPs mining method was implemented separately for the cases of the entire city and the four sub-regions. Empirically, the Min-prev is set between 0.1 and 0.5 (Leibovici et al., 2014; Yao et al., 2016; Yoo and Bow, 2011). High values of Min-prev may yield too few CPs, while low Min-prev values may increase computation time and generate too many results of CPs.…”
Section: Implementation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CPs mining method was implemented separately for the cases of the entire city and the four sub-regions. Empirically, the Min-prev is set between 0.1 and 0.5 (Leibovici et al., 2014; Yao et al., 2016; Yoo and Bow, 2011). High values of Min-prev may yield too few CPs, while low Min-prev values may increase computation time and generate too many results of CPs.…”
Section: Implementation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [43], Yoo and Bow studied the closed top-k co-location pattern mining problem. The authors also studied the maximal co-location pattern mining problem [42]. In [38], Yao et al proposed to construct a graph based on size-2 co-location patterns, and then find maximal cliques as the maximal co-location pattern candidates for better efficiency.…”
Section: Condensed Co-location Pattern Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, FNR was used to improve the accuracy of the prevalence index calculations in [6]. To reduce the number of prevalent colocations, mining maximal colocation patterns was disposed in [2][3][4]. But as far as we know, no work had been conducted on mining the maximal fuzzy prevalent colocation patterns based on the FNR, which will be addressed in this paper.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the downward closure property of prevalent colocation patterns, a prevalent colocation pattern is maximal when any of its subsets is prevalent while all of its supersets are not prevalent [2][3][4]. This means that all of the prevalent colocation patterns can be deduced from the maximal prevalent colocation patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%