Mining Open Payments Data: Analysis of Industry Payments to Thoracic Surgeons From 2014-2016

Abstract

BackgroundThe financial relationship between physicians and industries has become a hotly debated issue globally. The Physician Payments Sunshine Act of the US Affordable Care Act (2010) promoted transparency of the transactions between industries and physicians by making remuneration data publicly accessible in the Open Payments Program database. Meanwhile, according to the World Health Organization, the majority of all noncommunicable disease deaths were caused by cardiovascular disease.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the distribution of non-research and non-ownership payments made to thoracic surgeons, to explore the regularity of financial relationships between industries and thoracic surgeons.MethodsAnnual statistical data were obtained from the Open Payments Program general payment dataset from 2014-2016. We characterized the distribution of annual payments with single payment transactions greater than US $10,000, quantified the major expense categories (eg, Compensation, Consulting Fees, Travel and Lodging), and identified the 30 highest-paying industries. Moreover, we drew out the financial relations between industries to thoracic surgeons using chord diagram visualization.ResultsThe three highest categories with single payments greater than US $10,000 were Royalty or License, Compensation, and Consulting Fees. Payments related to Royalty or License transferred from only 5.38% of industries to 0.75% of surgeons with the highest median (US $13,753, $11,992, and $10,614 respectively) in 3-year period. In contrast, payments related to Food and Beverage transferred from 93.50% of industries to 98.48% of surgeons with the lowest median (US $28, $27, and $27). The top 30 highest-paying industries made up approximately 90% of the total payments (US $21,036,972, $23,304,996, and $28,116,336). Furthermore, just under 9% of surgeons received approximately 80% of the total payments in each of the 3 years. Specifically, the 100 highest cumulative payments, accounting for 52.69% of the total, transferred from 27 (6.05%) pharmaceutical industries to 86 (1.89%) thoracic surgeons from 2014-2016; 7 surgeons received payments greater than US $1,000,000; 12 surgeons received payments greater than US $400,000. The majority (90%) of these surgeons received tremendous value from only one industry.ConclusionsThere exists a great discrepancy in the distribution of payments by categories. Royalty or License Fees, Compensation, and Consulting Fees are the primary transferring channels of single large payments. The massive transfer from industries to surgeons has a strong “apical dominance” and excludability. Further research should focus on discovering the fundamental driving factors for the strong concentration of certain medical devices and how these payments will affect the industry itself.

Industry Payments to Plastic Surgeons, 2013 to 2018: Who’s Getting Paid?

“…14 In the field of thoracic surgery, less than 2 percent of thoracic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • January 2022 surgeons received greater than 52 percent of total industry payments, with seven thoracic surgeons receiving payment amounts in excess of $1 million. 15 The "apical" nature of industry contributions, with relatively few surgeons receiving the vast majority of net industry dollars, does appertain to the field of plastic surgery.…”

Assessment of the digestive system malignancy information in Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopedia: a longitudinal study

“…For the 3-year follow-up period, the initial data collection period ran from June 20, 2019 to July 1, 2019, and the final data collection period ran from June 20, 2022 to July 1, 2022. A period of 3 years is an acceptable and widely used length for a follow-up period (17)(18)(19); thus, we chose 3 years as the follow-up time for the comparison.…”

A Ray of Sunshine: Transparency in Physician-Industry Relationships Is Not Enough

“…The U.S. legislation has certainly been a boon for researchers examining conflicts of interest (COIs) and prescribing behavior. Dozens of articles using Open Payments data have been published, including national analyses of gift acceptance among physicians, 7,8 and many analyses of payments within multiple specialties, including oncologists, 9 neurologists, 10 cardiologists, 11 thoracic surgeons, 12 and ophthalmologists. 13 Open Payments has enabled numerous studies of discrepancies between disclosures of conflicts of interest and reported payments.…”