2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.dendro.2015.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mining the British Isles oak tree-ring data set. Part A: Rationale, data, software, and proof of concept

Abstract: a b s t r a c tFrom stuttering early beginnings, archaeological oak dendrochronology in the British Isles developed rapidly in the latter decades of the 20th century, to the present situation where dozens of new crossdated site chronologies are produced each year. Although unevenly spread in both space and time, the available data set is now so large (several thousand sites) that it has the potential to be mined for applications that were not envisaged when the data were originally collected. Here we compile a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The oak database used in this paper is essentially the same as that compiled by Fowler & Bridge (2015), supplemented by a few additional sites. The data consist of site chronologies from the British Isles, excluding inner-London and sites with fewer than three timbers (see Fowler & Bridge, 2015 for details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The oak database used in this paper is essentially the same as that compiled by Fowler & Bridge (2015), supplemented by a few additional sites. The data consist of site chronologies from the British Isles, excluding inner-London and sites with fewer than three timbers (see Fowler & Bridge, 2015 for details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it has earlier antecedents, the methodological roots of modern British dendrochronology can reasonably be traced to research undertaken from the late 1960s at Queen's University, Belfast (Baillie, 1982;Fowler and Bridge, 2015). By the early 1970s, the core elements of the "Belfast method" of statistical crossdating were established and had been made publically available in the form of the computer program CROS (Baillie and Pilcher, 1973 -BP73 hereafter).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although underpinning much early crossdating of oak (Baillie and Pilcher 1973), the use of high-pass filtering using five-year moving averages induces phase shifts in the resulting series and can generate spurious dating outcomes (Fowler and Bridge 2017). Alternatively, cubic smoothing splines with a 50% frequency cut-off over eight years similarly reduce decadal-scale variability while avoiding the associated phase shifts (Fowler and Bridge 2015). Consistent with this latter approach, we indexed each of the panel-and portrait-level ring-width series using a smoothing spline with an eight-year frequency response.…”
Section: Crossdatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative to that of continental Europe, Britain's climate exhibits a relatively high level of spatial inconsistency. That is, the relation between locations is relatively unstable and, as a consequence, site-level tree-ring chronologies contain a weaker geographic and relatively greater site-specific content than exhibited by European datasets (Fowler and Bridge 2015). Examples of living oak timbers correlating highly with locations far from their known origin (Bridge 2000a;Bridge 2012) illustrate this problem.…”
Section: Crossdating and Provenancingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference chronologies are established from cross-dated samples of ring-width measurements that are thought to represent local tree-growth. The location of the provenance is then approximated by the geographical area in which best matches between the ring-width patterns of a candidate series and the reference chronologies are found [ 16 ]. Generally, best matches are determined statistically using the same methods as for the (cross-)dating of ring-width series [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%