2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mink Aleutian disease seroprevalence in China during 1981–2017: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 40 selected studies, we chose ‘PLN’ for rate conversion data (Table S5; Gong et al., 2020; Li, Lang, et al, 2020; Li, Ni, et al, 2020). ), the combined prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection was between 1% and 90% (Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the 40 selected studies, we chose ‘PLN’ for rate conversion data (Table S5; Gong et al., 2020; Li, Lang, et al, 2020; Li, Ni, et al, 2020). ), the combined prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection was between 1% and 90% (Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A funnel plot, trim and fill analysis, and an Egger's test were used to assess the publication bias of studies. A sensitivity analysis was conducted, and one study was deleted at a time to check whether any one study would have a significant impact on the estimated results (Gong et al., 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sensitivity analysis was conducted to check whether any one study would have a significant impact on the estimates (38). Heterogeneity between studies is an important indicator in meta-analyses; thus, an accurate assessment of heterogeneity is necessary to finding the key for preventing Brucella spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, combined with the current nonstandardization of diagnostic tests and the existing limitations of various performance characteristics, we emphasize the need to use a single, standardized skin test performed by an independent and trained operator approved by OIE for the national monitoring plan. Research is continuing on new, more accurate and sensitive detection methods, less reliant on the measurement of the immune response in vitro (bovine interferon-c release assay or antibody ELISA) or in vivo (skin tests), which are less subject to the vagaries of individual operative performance and subjective interpretation (Churbanov et al 2012).The strategic application of the interferon-c assay, which in common with the tuberculin skin test reads the cell-mediated response to antigens and as such is an early-stage means to detect infection, has been found to be a useful adjunct to the tuberculin test (Good et al 2018).This method has been used in some European countries to promote the elimination of infected animals as early as possible (Neill et al 1994, Wood and Jones 2001, Gormley et al 2006), but it is more difficult to use in developing countries because it will greatly increase the cost of testing. The time required to run the ELISA test is much less compared to tuberculin skin test, which requires at least two field visits with a possible risk of having withdrawals before completion of the test (Refaya et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, when elaborating the information, the scores of the following items are determined as 1 point: clearly explain the detection method used, clearly indicate the sampling year, whether to randomly sample, describe the sample collection method in detail, or identify the tuberculin injection site and whether there are four or more risk factors. Articles can be assigned 0-5 points based on criteria, articles with 4 or 5 points are considered high quality, articles with 2-3 points are considered medium quality, and articles with 0-1 points are considered low quality (Gong et al 2020).…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%