Encyclopedia of Optimization 2001
DOI: 10.1007/0-306-48332-7_297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MINLP: Trim-Loss Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have shown an extension to the case of perspective formulations. Other instances that we know of are the trimloss instances of Harjunkoski et al (2009). These instances are known to be very difficult to solve (as far as we know, only the three smallest have been solved to optimality).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have shown an extension to the case of perspective formulations. Other instances that we know of are the trimloss instances of Harjunkoski et al (2009). These instances are known to be very difficult to solve (as far as we know, only the three smallest have been solved to optimality).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first important fact to note is that separability is a very common feature in this library of convex MINLPs coming from different applications. Eight different classes of problems are included in the library: batch synthesis problems (Ravemark andRippin 1998, Vecchietti andGrossmann 1999), different layout problems (Castillo et al 2005, Sawaya 2006, synthesis (Duran andGrossmann 1986, Türkay andGrossmann 1996) and retrofit synthesis (Sawaya 2006) problems, and trimloss (Harjunkoski et al 2009) problems. Among these eight classes only one is not separable according to our definition: the trimloss instances (these instances contain functions of the form − √ xy in their formulation).…”
Section: Ibm Cmu Minlp Library Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%