2016
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-5043-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minor Components of Micropapillary and Solid Subtypes in Lung Adenocarcinoma are Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Poor Prognosis

Abstract: BackgroundLung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary and solid predominant subtypes was reported to be associated with poor prognosis; however, whether minor components (non-predominant) of micropapillary and solid subtypes predict poor prognosis remains unknown. In this study, we investigated the predictive and prognostic value of lymph node metastasis of minor micropapillary and solid components.MethodsSpecimens of resected tumors of 1244 patients were reclassified to determine the predominant subtype and minor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

9
105
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
9
105
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also noticeable that the extent of staining increases from those tumours that are lepidic‐predominant to those that are acinar/papillary‐predominant to those are solid/micropapillary‐predominant. This result is in agreement with other studies showing that solid components of ADCs have high PD‐L1 expression . Our data also correlate with several studies on the importance of a predominant pattern for prognostication in resected ADCs, and, should a grading system based on a predominant pattern and pleomorphic features be implemented, this might have predictive value in relation to the response to immunomodulatory therapy, in similar fashion to solid/micropapillary patterns having relevance in relation to the response to conventional chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is also noticeable that the extent of staining increases from those tumours that are lepidic‐predominant to those that are acinar/papillary‐predominant to those are solid/micropapillary‐predominant. This result is in agreement with other studies showing that solid components of ADCs have high PD‐L1 expression . Our data also correlate with several studies on the importance of a predominant pattern for prognostication in resected ADCs, and, should a grading system based on a predominant pattern and pleomorphic features be implemented, this might have predictive value in relation to the response to immunomodulatory therapy, in similar fashion to solid/micropapillary patterns having relevance in relation to the response to conventional chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, distinguishing between invasive patterns may not be critical for overall diagnosis if the overarching pattern is invasive. However, reliably identifying more aggressive solid and micropapillary components is still important because of their association with a worse prognosis; even small (5%) components of micropapillary pattern have been associated with unfavourable patient outcomes . Further, adjuvant chemotherapy is reportedly more effective in ACA with a predominant solid or micropapillary pattern .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been effectively used to predict the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma patients. The classification was established on the most predominant subtype presented: invasive adenocarcinoma with solid (SOL) or micropapillary (MIP) carcinoma, which is associated with a poor survival (13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Both adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) have nearly 100% postsurgical survival, and limited resection is appropriate for those patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%