The self-aggregation of neutral [RuCl2(η6-p-cymene)(CAP)] (2; p-cymene = 1-methyl-4-(propan-2-yl)benzene) and ionic [RuCl(η6-p-cymene)(L)(CAP)](PF6) (3, L = CAP; 4, L = MeCN) and [RuCl2(η6-p-cymene)(CAP-H)](BPh4) (5; CAP-H = monoprotonated CAP) ruthenium(II) arene
complexes, bearing the water-soluble phosphine CAP (1,4,7-triaza-9-phosphatricyclo[5.3.2.1]tridecane),
in aprotic polar solvents, was investigated by means of PGSE (pulsed
field gradient spin–echo) diffusion NMR. In addition, the analogous
neutral [RuCl2(η6-p-cymene)(PTA)]
(1) and monoprotonated [RuCl2(η6-p-cymene)(PTA-H)](BPh4) (6) PTA (1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane) complexes were investigated
in acetonitrile-d
3. Complexes 1–4 do not exhibit any tendency to self-aggregate
in acetonitrile-d
3 and acetone-d
6. In contrast, 5 and 6 monoprotonated complexes undergo a peculiar self-aggregation process,
involving almost exclusively the cation, leading to the main formation
of dicationic species held together by intermolecular hydrogen bonds.
This has been clearly demonstrated by 1H diffusion NMR
experiments, which allowed measurement of an average hydrodynamic
volume for the cation that was more than double that expected, whereas
that of the counterion is only slightly higher than that of the free
anion. The trend of the aggregation number (N
+) as a function of the concentration of 5 and 6 was fitted using the equation of the equal K indefinite model of association, leading to ΔG°298 K = −3.1 and −3.0
kcal mol–1, respectively, for the formation of H-bonded
dications. The critical role played by the protonated −NH unit
in establishing hydrogen bonding was further supported by the detection
of 6
+
2 dinuclear
species in acetonitrile-d
3 solutions containing
equimolar mixtures of 2 and 6. The self-aggregation
free energy of 2 (ΔG°298 K = −3.1 kcal mol–1) and 6
+
(ΔG°298 K = −2.9 kcal mol–1) in
such mixed solutions is practically identical with those of 5 and 6 in acetonitrile-d
3.