1975
DOI: 10.1086/111831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minor planets and related objects. XVIII - UBV photometry and surface composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the completeness of optical asteroid surveys, we assume that they are complete to a V = 21.5 mag, commensurate with the 95% completeness limit from the SDSS (Juric et al 2002) and other surveys such as the Sub-Kilometer Asteroid Diameter Survey (Gladman et al 2009) and Spacewatch (Larsen et al 2007). Assuming that an asteroid will be detected at opposition by one of a number of surveys, we utilize the relation m V = H + 5 log[r h (r h − 1)], and calculate the completeness limits in terms of H in each of the four Main Belt asteroids zones as defined in Zellner et al (1975), adopting opposition and a heliocentric distance which corresponds to the outer semimajor axis range of each respective zone. These values range from absolute magnitudes of 18.6 in the inner Main Belt to 16.57 in the outer Main Belt.…”
Section: Completenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To assess the completeness of optical asteroid surveys, we assume that they are complete to a V = 21.5 mag, commensurate with the 95% completeness limit from the SDSS (Juric et al 2002) and other surveys such as the Sub-Kilometer Asteroid Diameter Survey (Gladman et al 2009) and Spacewatch (Larsen et al 2007). Assuming that an asteroid will be detected at opposition by one of a number of surveys, we utilize the relation m V = H + 5 log[r h (r h − 1)], and calculate the completeness limits in terms of H in each of the four Main Belt asteroids zones as defined in Zellner et al (1975), adopting opposition and a heliocentric distance which corresponds to the outer semimajor axis range of each respective zone. These values range from absolute magnitudes of 18.6 in the inner Main Belt to 16.57 in the outer Main Belt.…”
Section: Completenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a 5σ limiting flux of 10 mJy at 22 μm, a beaming parameter, η = 1.07, geometric albedo p V = 0.14, and an asteroid observed at opposition (phase angle α = 0) at a heliocentric distance of 2.5 AU and a geocentric distance (Δ) of 1.5 AU, WISE can only detect asteroids with diameters > ∼ 1.65 km, whereas under these same orbital assumptions and a flux completeness limit of 2 mJy, our Spitzer data is sensitive to asteroids with diameters D > ∼ 0.79 km. Zellner et al (1975) Main Belt Asteroid (MBA) I region (2.06 < a ≤ 2.5), the dotted line corresponds to MBAII (2.5 < a ≤ 2.82), the dashed line corresponds to MBAIII (2.82 < a ≤ 3.27). Bottom: diameter distributions of the Spitzer detected asteroids in the same regions.…”
Section: Completenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hapke (1971) noted the large variation of UBV colors of a material with particle size. Zellner et al (1975) shows that the scatter of UBV colors for specimens of a variety of diverse meteorite types (e.g. Eucrites, Howardites, H, L, LL and C3 chondrites) is larger than the difference in mean colors between types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We finally averaged the corresponding determinations and obtained (U − B) = 0.22 ± 0.01, (B − V) = 0.68 ± 0.01, (V − R) = 0.39 ± 0.01, and (R − I) = 0.32 ± 0.01. It is interesting to recall the implications of these color indices, in particular those involving the UBV bands, for classifying Lutetia (e.g., Zellner et al 1975). In the color-color diagram (U − V) versus (B − V), Lutetia strikingly lies well inside the taxonomy group M and completely outside the C group.…”
Section: The Color Of Asteroid 21 Lutetiamentioning
confidence: 99%