2018
DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2018.1482184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minority representation, tokenism, and well-being in army units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Women tokens tend to suffer social isolation from "professional networks" and experience heightened cultural boundaries from male peers as well as tend to function in gendercongruent roles, which limits their opportunities for growth (Yoder 1991: 179). Similar findings have been identified for the military settings (for a summary see Perez & Strizhko 2018). Yoder (2002: 5) stresses that women tokens tend not to receive "benign neglect" by the dominants (men) (cf.…”
Section: Women As Tokens and 'Honorary Men' In The Militarysupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Women tokens tend to suffer social isolation from "professional networks" and experience heightened cultural boundaries from male peers as well as tend to function in gendercongruent roles, which limits their opportunities for growth (Yoder 1991: 179). Similar findings have been identified for the military settings (for a summary see Perez & Strizhko 2018). Yoder (2002: 5) stresses that women tokens tend not to receive "benign neglect" by the dominants (men) (cf.…”
Section: Women As Tokens and 'Honorary Men' In The Militarysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…According to the theory, when a certain group of people in an organization has less then fifteen per cent of representation (e.g., women), they -as tokens and minority members -face certain disadvantages from the majority members (e.g., men, the dominants). The theory has been found to be relevant to the military setting as discussed by Yoder (1991) and Perez & Strizhko (2018).…”
Section: Women As Tokens and 'Honorary Men' In The Militarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the very large body of military research, several issues and topics are frequently covered that share conceptual overlap with organizational behavior and social, clinical, and cognitive psychology theories not focused on the military. The military journals more focused on social science frequently publish research on leadership (e.g., Fallesen, Keller-Glaze, & Curnow, 2011), mental health (e.g., Bergman, Przeworski, & Feeny, 2017;Galovski & Lyons, 2004), gender and race (Armor, 1996;Ben-Shalom, 2012; see special issue on gender in Armed Forces & Society, B. L. , well-being (Burrell, Adams, Durand, & Castro, 2006), and the intersection of these topics (e.g., gender, performance, and belonging in the military: Archer, 2013; minority representation and well-being: Perez & Strizhko, 2018). Much of this research was conducted within the context of the military itself, but there is also a large body of research on employment and mental-health issues among veterans (e.g., Dickstein et al, 2010).…”
Section: Central Psychological Issues Addressed In the Military Research: Opportunity For New Theoretical Applications And Integrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tokenism is classified as the practice of doing something (i.e., hiring one Black faculty member or appointing a Black colleague to a higher position) to prevent criticism and give the appearance on inclusion and diversity without the proper infrastructure to support those individuals ( Kelly, 2007 ). These actions often result in increased occupational stress and psychological symptoms for minority individuals ( Jackson et al., 1995 ; Perez & Strizhko, 2018 ). The heavy workload that provides higher standards for promotion and progression can also result in higher levels of stress that can interrupt health ( Blackstock, 2020 ; Carr, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%