2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-015-1113-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MIP model and elitist strategy hybrid GA–SA algorithm for layout design

Abstract: It is most important for any manufacturing industry to have an efficient layout for their production environment to participate in global competition. One of the prime objectives of such an organisation is to decide an optimal arrangement of their facilities (machines or departments) in a two-dimensional planar region satisfying desired objectives, which is termed facility layout problem. To overcome the drawbacks of traditional layout design methodology, it is attempted to solve three important layout design … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 67 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lacksonen (2018) [311] used a MILP model to find the block diagram layouts with varying department areas using a branch and bound algorithm. Leno et al (2018) [312] solved an unequal area facility layout problem with a MIP formulation by using an elitist strategy hybrid GA-SA algorithm. Recently, Wan et al (2020) [313] dealt with a multi-row facility layout problem by using an improved multi-objective greedy randomised adaptive search procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lacksonen (2018) [311] used a MILP model to find the block diagram layouts with varying department areas using a branch and bound algorithm. Leno et al (2018) [312] solved an unequal area facility layout problem with a MIP formulation by using an elitist strategy hybrid GA-SA algorithm. Recently, Wan et al (2020) [313] dealt with a multi-row facility layout problem by using an improved multi-objective greedy randomised adaptive search procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%