2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2014.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

miR-21 overexpression enhances TGF-β1-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by target smad7 and aggravates renal damage in diabetic nephropathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
102
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
102
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They negatively regulate gene expression by inducing translational inhibition or transcript degradation [63]. miR-21 has recently been recognized as a biomarker in various types of diseases, and it has also been confirmed to mediate TGF-β signaling and EMT.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They negatively regulate gene expression by inducing translational inhibition or transcript degradation [63]. miR-21 has recently been recognized as a biomarker in various types of diseases, and it has also been confirmed to mediate TGF-β signaling and EMT.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, TGF-β1 promotes the phosphorylation of R-smads by binding to the TGF-βR. In turn, the inhibitory smad7, a target of miR-21, can negatively regulate the phosphorylation of R-smads through the TGF-βR [40,41,42]. Whether TGF-β1 increases the Treg cell population and expression of foxp3 by a TGF-β1/smad-dependent signaling pathway or TGF-β1/smad-independent signaling pathways remains unknown [43,44,45].…”
Section: Expression Levels Of Mir-21 Foxp3 Tgf-β1 and Smad7 In Pbmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging evidence suggests that miRs contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetes and diabetic complications (5,15,31,43). Since each miR has its potential targeting genes, information of miR involvement in diabetes is helpful for identification of the targeted molecules as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%