Objective
Periodontitis causes periodontal tissue destruction and results in physiological tooth dysfunction. Therefore, periodontal regeneration is ideal therapy for periodontitis. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are useful for periodontal regenerative therapy as they can differentiate into periodontal cells; however, the underlying regulatory mechanism is unclear. In this study, we attempted to identify regulatory genes involved in periodontal cell differentiation and clarify the differentiation mechanism for effective periodontal regenerative therapy.
Background
The cementum and periodontal ligament play important roles in physiological tooth function. Therefore, cementum and periodontal ligament regeneration are critical for periodontal regenerative therapy. Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation can be a common periodontal regenerative therapy because these cells have multipotency and self‐renewal ability, which induces new cementum or periodontal ligament formation. Moreover, MSCs can differentiate into cementoblasts. Cementoblast‐ or periodontal ligament cell–specific proteins have been reported; however, it is unclear how these proteins are regulated. MicroRNA (miRNA) can also act as a key regulator of MSC function. Therefore, in this study, we identified regulatory genes involved in cementoblast or periodontal cell differentiation and commitment.
Methods
Human MSCs (hMSCs), cementoblasts (HCEM), and periodontal ligament cells (HPL cells) were cultured, and mRNA or miRNA expression was evaluated. Additionally, cementoblast‐specific genes were overexpressed or suppressed in hMSCs and their expression levels were investigated.
Results
HCEM and HPL cells expressed characteristic genes, of which we focused on ets variant 1 (ETV1), miR‐628‐5p, and miR‐383 because ETV1 is a differentiation‐related transcription factor, miR‐628‐5p was the second‐highest expressed gene in HCEM and lowest expressed gene in HPL cells, and miR‐383 was the highest expressed gene in HCEM. miR‐628‐5p and miR‐383 overexpression in hMSCs regulated ETV1 mRNA expression, and miR‐383 overexpression downregulated miR‐628‐5p expression. Moreover, miR‐383 suppression decreased miR‐383 expression and enhanced ETV1 mRNA expression, but miR‐383 suppression also decreased miR‐628‐5p. Furthermore, silencing of ETV1 expression in hMSCs regulated miR‐628‐5p and miR‐383 expression. Concerning periodontal cell commitment, miR‐628‐5p, miR‐383, and ETV1 regulated the expression of HCEM‐ or HPL cell–related genes by adjusting the expression of these miRNAs.
Conclusion
HCEM and HPL cells show characteristic mRNA and miRNA profiles. In particular, these cells have specific miR‐383, miR‐628‐5p, and ETV1 expression patterns, and these genes interact with each other. Therefore, miR‐383, miR‐628‐5p, and ETV1 are key genes involved in cementogenesis or HPL cell differentiation.