2012
DOI: 10.15359/ree.16-3.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miradas epistemológicas desde distintas perspectivas teóricas sobre la discapacidad

Abstract: Recibido 01 de febrero de 2012 • Corregido 22 de octubre de 2012 • Aceptado 07 de noviembre de 2012Resumen. Este artículo presenta distintas perspectivas teóricas y sus aproximaciones epistemológicas en el estudio de la discapacidad. Explica distintos enfoques para concebir la discapacidad según los diferentes aspectos que cada uno enfatiza, así como algunos de los debates entre dichos enfoques. El artículo aporta a la clarificación teórico-conceptual para el estudio e investigación sobre la discapacidad.Palab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the definitions included in the classification above emerge under the principle of normalization, where the criterion of "as normal as possible" 10 framed international and national legislations and the first integration approaches for people with disabilities in different areas: education, rehabilitation, labor, among others (Figari and Figari, 2005). In this sense, reference is made to the fact that this model focused on the individual puts the axis on the body, its deficiencies, and the medical assumption of biomedical normality, without considering the sociocultural circumstances (Berghs et al, 2016;Mareño Sempertegui & Masuero, 2010;Ferreira, 2007;Vargas Dengo, 2012). Thus, social representations of disability associated with the medical model are linked to diagnosis, disease, deficiency, individual attributes, medicalization, rehabilitation, and normalization (Barnes, 2003;Brogna, 2009;Berghs et al, 2016;Devenney, 2004;Suárez et al, 2011;Vargas Dengo, 2012).…”
Section: Medical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that the definitions included in the classification above emerge under the principle of normalization, where the criterion of "as normal as possible" 10 framed international and national legislations and the first integration approaches for people with disabilities in different areas: education, rehabilitation, labor, among others (Figari and Figari, 2005). In this sense, reference is made to the fact that this model focused on the individual puts the axis on the body, its deficiencies, and the medical assumption of biomedical normality, without considering the sociocultural circumstances (Berghs et al, 2016;Mareño Sempertegui & Masuero, 2010;Ferreira, 2007;Vargas Dengo, 2012). Thus, social representations of disability associated with the medical model are linked to diagnosis, disease, deficiency, individual attributes, medicalization, rehabilitation, and normalization (Barnes, 2003;Brogna, 2009;Berghs et al, 2016;Devenney, 2004;Suárez et al, 2011;Vargas Dengo, 2012).…”
Section: Medical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, reference is made to the fact that this model focused on the individual puts the axis on the body, its deficiencies, and the medical assumption of biomedical normality, without considering the sociocultural circumstances (Berghs et al, 2016;Mareño Sempertegui & Masuero, 2010;Ferreira, 2007;Vargas Dengo, 2012). Thus, social representations of disability associated with the medical model are linked to diagnosis, disease, deficiency, individual attributes, medicalization, rehabilitation, and normalization (Barnes, 2003;Brogna, 2009;Berghs et al, 2016;Devenney, 2004;Suárez et al, 2011;Vargas Dengo, 2012).…”
Section: Medical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Figari y Figari, 2005). En tal sentido, se hace referencia a que este modelo centrado en el individuo pone el eje en el cuerpo, sus deficiencias y en el supuesto médico de una normalidad biomédica, sin considerar las circunstancias socioculturales (Berghs et al, 2016;Mareño Sempertegui y Masuero, 2010;Ferreira, 2007;Vargas Dengo, 2012). De este modo, las representaciones sociales de la discapacidad asociadas al modelo médico se encuentran vinculadas al diagnóstico, la enfermedad, la deficiencia, los atributos individuales, la medicalización, la rehabilitación y la normalización (Barnes, 2003;Brogna, 2009;Berghs et al, 2016;Devenney, 2004;Suárez et al, 2011;Vargas Dengo, 2012).…”
Section: Modelo Medicounclassified