Underwater Vehicles 2009
DOI: 10.5772/6715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MiResolved Acceleration Control for Underwater Vehicle-Manipulator Systems: Continuous and Discrete Time Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. the controller receives the reference, r(k), at the time instant t = kT s ; 2. based on the dynamic model of the system and on the current states, x(k), and disturbances, w(k), an optimization process is performed over the prediction horizon, p, to minimize the cost function given in equation (32). The optimization is done through the calculation of an optimum control sequence, û, over the control horizon, c; 3. the first element of the control sequence is associated with the control input u(k), and sent to the system; 4. this process is repeated until k = N.…”
Section: Control Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1. the controller receives the reference, r(k), at the time instant t = kT s ; 2. based on the dynamic model of the system and on the current states, x(k), and disturbances, w(k), an optimization process is performed over the prediction horizon, p, to minimize the cost function given in equation (32). The optimization is done through the calculation of an optimum control sequence, û, over the control horizon, c; 3. the first element of the control sequence is associated with the control input u(k), and sent to the system; 4. this process is repeated until k = N.…”
Section: Control Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 The A-MPC has advantages once it is discrete, builtin using an optimal control law, imposing actuators constraints, while compensating for parameters uncertainties and wave-induced disturbances. Moreover, the computational load of the A-MPC is reduced in comparison with the NMPC adopted by other works, since in the A-MPC the optimization performed at each time step is convex and the number of decisions variables is reduced to control inputs, as shown on equation (32). Also, ROVs have slow dynamics compared to cruising type AUVs, for example, which turns the adopted strategy ideal for this problem, since sampling rate restrictions limit the MPC application to slow dynamic systems.…”
Section: Control Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…presented a continuous and a discrete version of the resolved acceleration control method for UVMSs. Unlike conventional approaches, this method obtains the desired values for the joints from kinematic and momentum equations with feedback of task-space signals Sagara (2009). also presented two types of disturbance observers for the UUV, to improve the compensation provided by the resolved acceleration control method for the variation of hydrodynamic parameters and disturbances induced by the manipulator motion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The I-AUV model is based on the Twin-Burger AUV equipped with a 2-DoFs manipulator with cylindrical-shaped links of stainless steel. This case of study is inspired by the works ofSagara (SAGARA et al, 2001;ISHITSUKA;ISHII, 2004;YATOH;TAMURA, 2008;SAGARA, 2009;TAIRA;OYA, 2018;TAIRA; OYA, 2020;AMBAR, 2020), who studied the motion control of I-AUVs using the Twin-Burger in some of them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%