1991
DOI: 10.1086/132920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mirror, dome, and natural seeing at CFHT

Abstract: A large and homogeneous set of image quality data, obtained with HRCam at the prime focus of the CFHT, was correlated with thermal sensor data to identify and quantify "local seeing" effects. The main findings are as follows.1. Mirror seeing is an important source of image spread and amounts to FWHM = 0'.'40/°C 6/5 when the primary mirror is warmer than the air inside the dome.2. Dome seeing is marginally significant, at the rate of ~ 0'.'1/°C 6/5 of temperature difference between the air inside and outside th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
6
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…30,31 This corresponds to an r 0 of 250 mm, which is much higher than the average results reported here for any of the sites. An interesting question is why the r 0 average for Mana Kea is nearly twice as large as observed from Mt.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…30,31 This corresponds to an r 0 of 250 mm, which is much higher than the average results reported here for any of the sites. An interesting question is why the r 0 average for Mana Kea is nearly twice as large as observed from Mt.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…In addition, microthermal probe data collected within the 1.6-m dome showed that internal heat sources have a substantial contribution, an effect long observed at the California-France-Hawaii Telescope. 30 Only two of the sites involved data collection in large domes with other instrumentation, Mt. Haleakala, Hawaii, and McDonald Observatory, Texas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comments on each panel of Figure 4 are made in § 3.3. Table 2 compares the convective local-seeing coefficients in Table 1 with those of Racine et al (1991). Note that what was defined as mirror seeing by Racine et al corresponds to the 5/3 power law sum of the mirror, caisson, and tube seeing here and that their dome seeing is referred to as slit seeing here.…”
Section: Iq Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5 gives the distribution of the natural atmospheric seeing at the CFHT site. Racine et al 1991 first quantified the relation between local seeing and temperature differences at the CFHT. The present study has much refined and strengthened this relation.…”
Section: The Results Of Local Deteriorations Removal On Iq Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation