2016
DOI: 10.1090/tran/6749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mirror extensions of rational vertex operator algebras

Abstract: In this paper, mirror extensions of rational vertex operator algebras are considered. The mirror extension conjecture is proved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our main result will be that under fairly general conditions, (sub)categories of U -and V -modules enjoy a kind of "mirror duality," that is, there is a braid-reversing tensor equivalence relating the U -modules that occur in A with the V -modules that occur in A. Such a result has obtained earlier under stronger assumptions in [Lin,CKM2]. Here, although we do assume that the representation theory of U is quite nice, we make fairly minimal assumptions on V , mainly just that V has a suitable representation category that admits the vertex algebraic braided tensor category structure of [HLZ1]- [HLZ8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Our main result will be that under fairly general conditions, (sub)categories of U -and V -modules enjoy a kind of "mirror duality," that is, there is a braid-reversing tensor equivalence relating the U -modules that occur in A with the V -modules that occur in A. Such a result has obtained earlier under stronger assumptions in [Lin,CKM2]. Here, although we do assume that the representation theory of U is quite nice, we make fairly minimal assumptions on V , mainly just that V has a suitable representation category that admits the vertex algebraic braided tensor category structure of [HLZ1]- [HLZ8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It is natural to consider the full subcategory C of U ⊗ V-modules whose objects are (isomorphic to) direct sums of modules X ⊗ Y where X is a module in U and Y is a module in V. For the following theorem, we make fairly minimal assumptions on the vertex operator algebras U and V; for similar results along these lines see for instance [Lin,Lemma 2.16] and [CKLinR,Proposition 3.3].…”
Section: From Tensor Categories To Vertex Operator Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second part of Main Theorem 3 (in the case that A is Z-graded) has been stated in [Lin,Theorem 3.3] under the assumption that U and V are strongly rational vertex operator algebras (in particular I is finite in this setting). The proof in [Lin] uses semisimplicity of the category Rep A of left A-modules in C, citing [KO] for this result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also initiate a study of the representation theory of these models. On general grounds, since W G and W G = W G are commutant pairs in the moonshine module, one has a Schur-Weyl like decomposition of the form [40,41]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%