2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1501.05334
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mirror Symmetry and the Classification of Orbifold del Pezzo Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…
We classify non-smooth del Pezzo surfaces with 1 3 (1, 1) points in 29 qG-deformation families grouped into six unprojection cascades (this overlaps with work of Fujita and Yasutake [14]), we tabulate their biregular invariants, we give good model constructions for surfaces in all families as degeneracy loci in rep quotient varieties, and we prove that precisely 26 families admit qG-degenerations to toric surfaces. This work is part of a program to study mirror symmetry for orbifold del Pezzo surfaces [2].
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
We classify non-smooth del Pezzo surfaces with 1 3 (1, 1) points in 29 qG-deformation families grouped into six unprojection cascades (this overlaps with work of Fujita and Yasutake [14]), we tabulate their biregular invariants, we give good model constructions for surfaces in all families as degeneracy loci in rep quotient varieties, and we prove that precisely 26 families admit qG-degenerations to toric surfaces. This work is part of a program to study mirror symmetry for orbifold del Pezzo surfaces [2].
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, by (4) and (7), the v i are primitive lattice vectors in N . These vectors are all distinct: (2). Similarly v 1 , v 2 are both distinct from v 3 because their y-coordinates have different signs: y 1 = y 2 = −ℓ 1 , which is negative by (2), while y 3 is positive by (3).…”
Section: Characterization Of Polygonal Quiversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These vectors are all distinct: (2). Similarly v 1 , v 2 are both distinct from v 3 because their y-coordinates have different signs: y 1 = y 2 = −ℓ 1 , which is negative by (2), while y 3 is positive by (3). This observation also shows that v 1 , v 2 both lie on the line {(x, y) | y = −ℓ 1 } ⊂ N Q , but this line does not contain v 3 .…”
Section: Characterization Of Polygonal Quiversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 3.18. Consider the toric surface (using the notation for these surfaces appearing in [3]). X 5,5/3 associated with the Fano polygon shown below.…”
Section: Mutations Of Polytopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular we see that finite mutation classes of polygons fall into four types A n 1 , for n ∈ Z ≥0 , A 2 , A 3 , and D 4 . There is a close connection between mutation classes of Fano polygons and Q-Gorenstein deformations of the corresponding toric varieties which is described in detail in [3]. Following these ideas we predict the existence of a finite type parameter space for these deformations, together with a boundary stratification such that each zero stratum corresponds to a polygon in the given mutation class, and the 1-strata corresponds to the mutation families constructed by Ilten [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%