Mirrors for Bureaucrats: Expectations of Christian Officials in the Theodosian Empire

Whelan, Robin

doi:10.1017/s0075435818000254

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 77 publications

(57 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Leppin 2012, notes how this limited the impact of "totalisation" by Christianity. 62 R. Whelan 2018. these have an important place in the historiography, especially Remigius of Rheims' famous letter to Clovis and Cathwulf's letter to Charlemagne (key evidence, of course, for the influence of Irish texts on the continent). 63 Rather more obscure is the letter to Theudebert I written by Bishop Aurelianus (of an unknown see): in most scholarship this has been taken as a Christianized recitation of traditional Roman imperial virtues for a ruler, but Hans Hubert Anton has pointed out how the letter exceeds traditional political discourse to end up stressing the king's identity as a Christian rather than as a ruler, while Robin Whelan has recently pointed out that the letter accepts, without critique or challenge, the existence of a secular sphere as the wider political context in which Theudebert's Christianity could be practiced.…”

Section: IVmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Christianization of Political Discourse: Reflections on the Irish Evidence

O’Brien¹

2022

Journal of Late Antiquity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A wealth of political writings survives from early Christian Ireland. While traditionally this material has been understood in terms of a dichotomy between "pagan" and "Christian," recent scholarship has borrowed the category of the "secular" from late antique studies to make sense of early Irish intellectual culture and its political discourses. This article builds on this trend to reveal, through close examination of seventh-century Irish writings, a multitude of differently Christianized discourses existing simultaneously, sometimes even within a single text. Just as the boundary between the "pagan" and the "secular" was not fixed, so too the boundary between the "Christian" and the "secular," giving rise to many different ways late antique Christians (in Ireland and elsewhere) could speak about politics.Much late antique scholarship on the "secular" assumes it was a passing phase ending in Christianization, but this research argues that "secularity" retained its importance in societies where Christians constantly debated and disagreed over where the boundaries of the "Christian" lay.Ireland does not often feature in late antique studies. 1 This is a gap for which many reasons exist: the tendency for late antiquity to be defined in terms of the late Roman empire or the eastern Mediterranean necessarily limits the significance of Irish evidence, itself often very difficult to access and analyse; this is further exacerbated by a regrettable tendency (by scholars of both Ireland and late antiquity) to treat early Irish history as separate from the European mainstream. Despite a long tradition of interest in the great peregrini (Columbanus in particular tends to be seen as a European figure), unfortunate circumstances led to Ireland's marginal role in the ground-breaking Transformation of the Roman World project 1 For a recent shift in the scholarship see below n. 22.

show abstract

Section: IVmentioning

confidence: 99%